Comparison Overview

Library System of Lancaster County

VS

Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD)

Library System of Lancaster County

1866 Colonial Village Ln, Lancaster, 17601, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23

Our mission: Provide resources, services, and expertise in a collaborative manner to and with the Member Libraries in order to effectively serve our communities. Our vision: The Library System of Lancaster County supports Member Libraries to be vibrant community centers where people and communities connect to what they need to achieve their greatest potential. Together with Member Libraries, we foster an environment of collaboration, trust and transparency that propels continual development. Member Libraries choose us as an integral partner in their strategy for success.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 30
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD)

1370 Dell Avenue, Campbell, CA, 95008, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Santa Clara County Library District is an open forum promoting knowledge, ideas, and cultural enrichment. The library provides free access to informational, educational, and recreational materials and services. In response to community needs, the library provides diverse resources on a wide variety of subjects and viewpoints and helps people use these resources. WE ARE: 7 Community Libraries 1 Branch Library 2 Bookmobiles Online Library 24/7 SERVING THE AREAS OF: Campbell Cupertino Gilroy Los Altos Los Altos Hills Milpitas Monte Sereno Morgan Hill Saratoga All Unincorporated areas of Santa Clara County OUR RESOURCES: $50,714,808 BUDGET 287.40 Full Time Equivalents staff positions 23,946 open hours serving the public 59,622 volunteer hours OUR PEOPLE: SERVICE POPULATION 440,440 355,720 cardholders 3,337,726 library visits 4,105,146 website visits OUR COLLECTION: 2,051,703 ITEMS 9,259,837 checkouts 1,575,652 database searches OUR EVENTS: 5,975 classes and programs in 2018 233,851 in program attendance in 2018 SUMMER READING PROGRAM 2018 402 classes and programs 23,651 in program attendance 32,123 Summer Reading Club Participants 5,388 Lunch at the Library meals served

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 98
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/library-system-of-lancaster-county.jpeg
Library System of Lancaster County
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/santaclaracountylibrarydistrict.jpeg
Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Library System of Lancaster County
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Library System of Lancaster County in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD) in 2025.

Incident History — Library System of Lancaster County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Library System of Lancaster County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/library-system-of-lancaster-county.jpeg
Library System of Lancaster County
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/santaclaracountylibrarydistrict.jpeg
Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD)
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2013
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Theft of Laptop
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Library System of Lancaster County company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD) company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Library System of Lancaster County company has not reported any.

In the current year, Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD) company and Library System of Lancaster County company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD) company nor Library System of Lancaster County company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD) company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Library System of Lancaster County company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD) company nor Library System of Lancaster County company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Library System of Lancaster County company nor Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Library System of Lancaster County nor Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Library System of Lancaster County company.

Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD) company employs more people globally than Library System of Lancaster County company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Library System of Lancaster County nor Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Library System of Lancaster County nor Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Library System of Lancaster County nor Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Library System of Lancaster County nor Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Library System of Lancaster County nor Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Library System of Lancaster County nor Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H