Comparison Overview

LH Group

VS

Cushing

LH Group

24-25 Frederick Settlement, Caroni, undefined, undefined, TT
Last Update: 2025-12-12

LH Group is the leading supplier of packaging solutions within the Caribbean and South American region. With over thirty five years experience and an extensive customer reach in over 20 countries, the Group has build a sound reputation through seamless trustworthy relationships with our strategic business partners to strengthen and enhance their brands. The ongoing application of innovative technology and auditing processes, the support of committed and accountable employees and superior customer service has impacted positively on our customer brands toward achieving global standards and market share success. We manage with our valued clients their packaging inventory through agreed service level agreements. We live our core values of integrity, trust and respect for all; customer focused; partnering with our people and pursuit of results.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cushing

213 West Institute Place, Chicago, Illinois, 60610, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Cushing is a leading print and digital communications firm offering a wide variety of services. Cushing is a third generation family business that prides itself on providing innovative solutions for its clients. In fact, we were a founding member of the ReproMax group. Additionally, we are a City of Chicago-certified Women’s Business Enterprise (WBE), led by our company president, Cathleen Cushing Duff. We are not only certified in Chicago, but on a national level as well. Through our certification, we’ll help you fulfill your vendor diversity needs. Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Cushingco Twitter: https://twitter.com/cushingco Google+: https://plus.google.com/b/107504391711577053315/107504391711577053315/posts?cfem=1

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lh-group-tt.jpeg
LH Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cushing.jpeg
Cushing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LH Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cushing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LH Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cushing in 2025.

Incident History — LH Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LH Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cushing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cushing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lh-group-tt.jpeg
LH Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cushing.jpeg
Cushing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cushing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LH Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cushing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LH Group company.

In the current year, Cushing company and LH Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cushing company nor LH Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cushing company nor LH Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cushing company nor LH Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LH Group company nor Cushing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LH Group nor Cushing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cushing company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to LH Group company.

Cushing company employs more people globally than LH Group company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither LH Group nor Cushing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LH Group nor Cushing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LH Group nor Cushing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LH Group nor Cushing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LH Group nor Cushing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LH Group nor Cushing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N