Comparison Overview

LGP Print

VS

Control Print Ltd.

LGP Print

4 Millennium Drive, Leeds, LS11 5BP, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1977 as a family business, LGP Print is a commercial printers based in Leeds, West Yorkshire. After almost 50 years, our goal remains to deliver a personal approach to print, with sustainable results and success for clients from a wide range of sectors. Our wide range of equipment means no job is too small, and our clear, straight forward approach means we service local gems, national operators and global corporates.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Control Print Ltd.

C106 Hind saurashtra Industrial Estate, Mumbai, 400059, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Control Print Limited, headquartered in Mumbai, is India’s leading manufacturer of coding and marking solutions. Established in 1991, the company has over three decades of experience in providing reliable, innovative, and cost-effective printing solutions that help manufacturers meet compliance, traceability, and branding needs. With 11 branches across India and international offices in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Oman, Control Print serves a wide range of industries globally. It operates two state-of-the-art manufacturing facilities in Nalagarh (Himachal Pradesh) and Guwahati (Assam), supported by a team of 800+ employees, including 300+ factory-trained engineers. In addition to our intelligent printing and marking systems designed for primary, secondary, and tertiary levels of packaging, Control Print manufactures and supplies a wide range of ink and consumables for marking applications across India. Contact our coding and marking experts by writing to [email protected] or calling +91 8097466782 to book a demo.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 780
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lgp-print.jpeg
LGP Print
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/control-print-ltd.jpeg
Control Print Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LGP Print
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Control Print Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LGP Print in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Control Print Ltd. in 2025.

Incident History — LGP Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LGP Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Control Print Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Control Print Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lgp-print.jpeg
LGP Print
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/control-print-ltd.jpeg
Control Print Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Control Print Ltd. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LGP Print company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Control Print Ltd. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LGP Print company.

In the current year, Control Print Ltd. company and LGP Print company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Control Print Ltd. company nor LGP Print company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Control Print Ltd. company nor LGP Print company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Control Print Ltd. company nor LGP Print company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LGP Print company nor Control Print Ltd. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LGP Print nor Control Print Ltd. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither LGP Print company nor Control Print Ltd. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Control Print Ltd. company employs more people globally than LGP Print company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither LGP Print nor Control Print Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LGP Print nor Control Print Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LGP Print nor Control Print Ltd. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LGP Print nor Control Print Ltd. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LGP Print nor Control Print Ltd. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LGP Print nor Control Print Ltd. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N