Comparison Overview

LFB GROUP

VS

Lasertec Inc

LFB GROUP

ZI les Meurières BP71, 6 rue des albatros, MIONS, FR, 69780
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

LFB Group (formerly Lennox EMEA) is a European leader in Refrigeration, HVAC, and Data Center Climate Solutions. With a legacy built on decades of expertise and a future driven by innovation, LFB Group delivers comprehensive and reliable climate control solutions across Europe. Through our trusted brands, Friga-Bohn and Lennox, we combine proven technologies, engineering excellence, and a strong commitment to sustainability. For more information, please visit: www.grouplfb.com

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 396
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lasertec Inc

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Lasertec is a professional manufacture in optics and photonics industry. We provide precision optics such as lenses,mirrors, prisms, windows and filters made UV material to IR material. Lasertec have capability advance in supper polishing, coating, assemble. We expect to support customer with competitive price with impress performance. The mainly optics list : Lenses : concave, convex, Cylindrical, rod lenses. Mirrors, Si,Ge,Fused silica, Laser mirrors. Filter, IPL filter, bio-filter, Telcom filters Lenses assemble, special optics and assemble. Laser material, Nonlinear crystals

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lfbgrouphvacr.jpeg
LFB GROUP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lasertec-inc.jpeg
Lasertec Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LFB GROUP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lasertec Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LFB GROUP in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lasertec Inc in 2025.

Incident History — LFB GROUP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LFB GROUP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lasertec Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lasertec Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lfbgrouphvacr.jpeg
LFB GROUP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lasertec-inc.jpeg
Lasertec Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lasertec Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LFB GROUP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lasertec Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LFB GROUP company.

In the current year, Lasertec Inc company and LFB GROUP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lasertec Inc company nor LFB GROUP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lasertec Inc company nor LFB GROUP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lasertec Inc company nor LFB GROUP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LFB GROUP company nor Lasertec Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LFB GROUP nor Lasertec Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither LFB GROUP company nor Lasertec Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LFB GROUP company employs more people globally than Lasertec Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither LFB GROUP nor Lasertec Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LFB GROUP nor Lasertec Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LFB GROUP nor Lasertec Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LFB GROUP nor Lasertec Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LFB GROUP nor Lasertec Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LFB GROUP nor Lasertec Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H