Comparison Overview

Lexington Center For Recovery

VS

North Texas Behavioral Health Authority

Lexington Center For Recovery

20 Manchester Rd, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603-2412, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Celebrating our 40th year of operation, Lexington Center for Recovery, Inc. is the largest provider of outpatient substance use disorder treatment in the Hudson Valley. Treatment services are available in Dutchess, Rockland and Westchester counties. Services in Sullivan County coming soon. Treatment is always client-centered and tailored to meet the needs of the individual and/or family.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 156
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

North Texas Behavioral Health Authority

8111 LBJ Fwy W, Dallas, 75251, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

The North Texas Behavioral Health Authority (NTBHA) is the Texas state-designated Local Behavioral Health Authority (LBHA) for the counties of Dallas, Ellis, Hunt, Kaufman, Navarro, and Rockwall. NTBHA was created to be a safety net for our behavioral health system of care, which encompasses mental health and substance use for persons eligible for Medicaid and/or public behavioral health funds, and mental health crisis services within our six-county region. We accomplish this by contracting with various mental health and substance use services providers throughout our region to ensure individual choice of provider. NTBHA received its Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic (CCBHC) certification in partnership with Child and Family Guidance Center, Homeward Bound, and Southern Area Behavioral Healthcare, which ensures a holistic, "no wrong door" approach to providing accessible, high-quality, recovery-oriented services. NTBHA is committed to providing quality behavioral health services for individuals, regardless of their ability to pay, place of residence, and/or their experience with homelessness. We will reduce or waive fees for those experiencing financial hardship using the sliding fee discount schedule provided by the Texas Health and Human Services Commission. NTBHA seeks to develop a collaborative system of care for individuals experiencing mental illness and/or substance use disorders. Collaborative Responsibility is the belief that the public healthcare system, which serves a community, is the responsibility of that community.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 121
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lexington-center-for-recovery.jpeg
Lexington Center For Recovery
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ntbha6.jpeg
North Texas Behavioral Health Authority
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lexington Center For Recovery
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
North Texas Behavioral Health Authority
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lexington Center For Recovery in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for North Texas Behavioral Health Authority in 2026.

Incident History — Lexington Center For Recovery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lexington Center For Recovery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — North Texas Behavioral Health Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

North Texas Behavioral Health Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lexington-center-for-recovery.jpeg
Lexington Center For Recovery
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ntbha6.jpeg
North Texas Behavioral Health Authority
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lexington Center For Recovery company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to North Texas Behavioral Health Authority company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, North Texas Behavioral Health Authority company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lexington Center For Recovery company.

In the current year, North Texas Behavioral Health Authority company and Lexington Center For Recovery company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither North Texas Behavioral Health Authority company nor Lexington Center For Recovery company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither North Texas Behavioral Health Authority company nor Lexington Center For Recovery company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither North Texas Behavioral Health Authority company nor Lexington Center For Recovery company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lexington Center For Recovery company nor North Texas Behavioral Health Authority company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lexington Center For Recovery nor North Texas Behavioral Health Authority holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lexington Center For Recovery company nor North Texas Behavioral Health Authority company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lexington Center For Recovery company employs more people globally than North Texas Behavioral Health Authority company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Lexington Center For Recovery nor North Texas Behavioral Health Authority holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lexington Center For Recovery nor North Texas Behavioral Health Authority holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lexington Center For Recovery nor North Texas Behavioral Health Authority holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lexington Center For Recovery nor North Texas Behavioral Health Authority holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lexington Center For Recovery nor North Texas Behavioral Health Authority holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lexington Center For Recovery nor North Texas Behavioral Health Authority holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N