Comparison Overview

Lexington Center For Recovery

VS

El Paso Child Guidance Center

Lexington Center For Recovery

20 Manchester Rd, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603-2412, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Celebrating our 40th year of operation, Lexington Center for Recovery, Inc. is the largest provider of outpatient substance use disorder treatment in the Hudson Valley. Treatment services are available in Dutchess, Rockland and Westchester counties. Services in Sullivan County coming soon. Treatment is always client-centered and tailored to meet the needs of the individual and/or family.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 156
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

El Paso Child Guidance Center

2701 E YANDELL DR, EL PASO, 79903, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Since 1954, the El Paso Child Guidance Center has provided borderland effective, efficient and compassionate mental health care through prevention and intervention, coordinated care, therapy, and psychiatry. The Center serves anyone ages two to adulthood who is experiencing mental health challenges. No client is ever turned away due to an inability to pay.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lexington-center-for-recovery.jpeg
Lexington Center For Recovery
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/el-paso-child-guidance-center-inc.jpeg
El Paso Child Guidance Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lexington Center For Recovery
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
El Paso Child Guidance Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lexington Center For Recovery in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for El Paso Child Guidance Center in 2026.

Incident History — Lexington Center For Recovery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lexington Center For Recovery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — El Paso Child Guidance Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

El Paso Child Guidance Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lexington-center-for-recovery.jpeg
Lexington Center For Recovery
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/el-paso-child-guidance-center-inc.jpeg
El Paso Child Guidance Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lexington Center For Recovery company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to El Paso Child Guidance Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, El Paso Child Guidance Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lexington Center For Recovery company.

In the current year, El Paso Child Guidance Center company and Lexington Center For Recovery company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither El Paso Child Guidance Center company nor Lexington Center For Recovery company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither El Paso Child Guidance Center company nor Lexington Center For Recovery company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither El Paso Child Guidance Center company nor Lexington Center For Recovery company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lexington Center For Recovery company nor El Paso Child Guidance Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lexington Center For Recovery nor El Paso Child Guidance Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lexington Center For Recovery company nor El Paso Child Guidance Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lexington Center For Recovery company employs more people globally than El Paso Child Guidance Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Lexington Center For Recovery nor El Paso Child Guidance Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lexington Center For Recovery nor El Paso Child Guidance Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lexington Center For Recovery nor El Paso Child Guidance Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lexington Center For Recovery nor El Paso Child Guidance Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lexington Center For Recovery nor El Paso Child Guidance Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lexington Center For Recovery nor El Paso Child Guidance Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.