Comparison Overview

Lexgo

VS

National Law Foundation

Lexgo

Callao 2911, Las Condes, Santiago Metropolitan Region, CL, 7550293
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 700 and 749

Lexgo offers legal advise and represents hundreds of companies in the Americas. Our clients trust us for the creation of new branches, the legal administration of their companies, international hiring and tax compliance. Our service exceeds the expected user experience in the industry by focusing on constant communication, speedy delivery and customer success.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

National Law Foundation

undefined, Wilmington, DE, 19710, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The National Law Foundation (NLF) provides quality continuing legal education (CLE) to attorneys. Our first program featured the 1976 Tax Reform Act in Baltimore, Maryland. As our customers' needs have increased, so have the programs and products we offer. These include live seminars, self-study available in video, audio or audio CD formats, accompanying books and, with this website, online CLE courses. Our goal is to provide lawyers with: Fast Personal Services Quality CLE Programs and Products Low Prices Fast Personal Service We treat you the way we like to be treated, with personal attention to detail and swift service. We have live operators ready to help, and every order (that mails) is shipped no later than the next business day! Quality CLE Programs and Products Our speakers are chosen for their ability to articulate, their expertise and also their willingness to provide useful and practical tips, warnings and suggestions. Our hiring process is very stringent. Low Prices The National Law Foundation wants to provide you with the lowest prices possible. Here are some ways we save you money: $21 Per Hour Online Courses — Most of our online courses are only $21 per hour. Illinois and Pennsylvania attorneys pay an additional nominal per-hour reporting fee as required by their states' MCLE Commissions. Our Unique "Share and Save Policy" —We allow attorneys to share all recorded materials (audio CDs, DVDs, etc.), purchased on our www.nlfcle.com Web site, with as many attorneys as they wish at no additional charge in all states permitted by the CLE commission. (Additional users of Illinois and New York courses pay a small fee because of their states' verification procedures.) Online courses are not included in this offer.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lexgohq.jpeg
Lexgo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-law-foundation.jpeg
National Law Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lexgo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Law Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lexgo in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Law Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — Lexgo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lexgo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Law Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Law Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lexgohq.jpeg
Lexgo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-law-foundation.jpeg
National Law Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Law Foundation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lexgo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Law Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lexgo company.

In the current year, National Law Foundation company and Lexgo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Law Foundation company nor Lexgo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Law Foundation company nor Lexgo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Law Foundation company nor Lexgo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lexgo company nor National Law Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lexgo nor National Law Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lexgo company nor National Law Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lexgo company employs more people globally than National Law Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Lexgo nor National Law Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lexgo nor National Law Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lexgo nor National Law Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lexgo nor National Law Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lexgo nor National Law Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lexgo nor National Law Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X