Comparison Overview

Lewisburg Patterson Company

VS

Classic Color

Lewisburg Patterson Company

USA, US
Last Update: 2025-12-16
Between 750 and 799

LEWISBURG PRINTING COMPANY + HUSTON PATTERSON PRINTERS Lewisburg Printing Company and Huston Patterson have joined forces to create Lewisburg Patterson Company. As a result, you’re going to get more on your printed projects. More ways to achieve higher quality within your budget. More ways to print on any surface. More ways to meet any deadline. For big jobs. Small jobs. Custom jobs. Even impossible jobs. We do more so you don’t have to. Meet Lewisburg Patterson Company. The blockbuster combination of Lewisburg Printing Company and Huston Patterson. LPC, Champions of More.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 116
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Classic Color

2424 South 25th Avenue, Broadview, Illinois, US, 60155
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Classic Color is a world leader in pre-media, digital artistry, and innovative printing. For over 40 years we’ve helped our clients connect with their audience in a memorable and meaningful way. We work with big and small businesses, and we're dedicated to consistency regardless of process or medium. Our workflow is seamless from concept to fulfillment and we deliver quality down to the finest detail—and always with an eye on schedule and scope. We bring simplicity to your business. We bring quality to your ideas. We bring your brand to life.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 88
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lewisburgpattersoncompany.jpeg
Lewisburg Patterson Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/classic-color.jpeg
Classic Color
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lewisburg Patterson Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Classic Color
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lewisburg Patterson Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Classic Color in 2025.

Incident History — Lewisburg Patterson Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lewisburg Patterson Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Classic Color (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Classic Color cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lewisburgpattersoncompany.jpeg
Lewisburg Patterson Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/classic-color.jpeg
Classic Color
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Lewisburg Patterson Company company and Classic Color company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Classic Color company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lewisburg Patterson Company company.

In the current year, Classic Color company and Lewisburg Patterson Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Classic Color company nor Lewisburg Patterson Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Classic Color company nor Lewisburg Patterson Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Classic Color company nor Lewisburg Patterson Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lewisburg Patterson Company company nor Classic Color company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lewisburg Patterson Company nor Classic Color holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lewisburg Patterson Company company nor Classic Color company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lewisburg Patterson Company company employs more people globally than Classic Color company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Lewisburg Patterson Company nor Classic Color holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lewisburg Patterson Company nor Classic Color holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lewisburg Patterson Company nor Classic Color holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lewisburg Patterson Company nor Classic Color holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lewisburg Patterson Company nor Classic Color holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lewisburg Patterson Company nor Classic Color holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N