Comparison Overview

Lewis Bolt and Nut Company

VS

Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd

Lewis Bolt and Nut Company

30105 6th Ave. , La Junta, Colorado, 81050, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

At Lewis Bolt and Nut we are continuously working to take the railroad fastening industry to the next level by exceeding the expectations of our customers with top quality fastening products, the fastest service available, and knowledgeable, prompt communication. We strive to build products that improve performance, save time and ultimately reduce maintenance costs. In addition, we are recognized as the industry leader in engineering, quality, testing, and machining. We have unmatched service in the design and production of fasteners and forgings.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd

Australia and New Zealand, ASQUITH, 2077, AU
Last Update:
Between 700 and 749

After 30 years, two name changes and countless successfully completed projects Australian Rail Technology (ART) is still resolutely committed to helping customers achieve the most from their precious rail assets. Over the years the company has built on its hard earned reputation as being the industry specialist for custom engineered products, or modification of existing systems to meet new requirements or improve reliability. With a reach across Australia and NZ, ART’s extensive product knowledge and expertise spans overhead wire (OHW), locomotive and passenger rolling stock, substations and signalling systems. Its unparalleled product knowledge and engineering expertise is on hand to meet the needs of existing and new customers. ART’s range of equipment covers products manufactured by the company, value added solutions and the supply of general products and equipment. Manufactured OHW products include 1500VDC isolators, multi-position switches, earthing switches and motorisation. The Service and Repair division can refurbish, re-engineer or renovate all electrical and electronic train borne systems, including data loggers, master controllers, power control systems, power supplies, contactors & more, and the Engineering Division can project manage and deliver the most demanding rolling stock project, from concept to commissioning. Find us at www.ar-tech.com.au

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lewisboltandnut.jpeg
Lewis Bolt and Nut Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-rail-technology-pty-ltd.jpeg
Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lewis Bolt and Nut Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lewis Bolt and Nut Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Lewis Bolt and Nut Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lewis Bolt and Nut Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lewisboltandnut.jpeg
Lewis Bolt and Nut Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-rail-technology-pty-ltd.jpeg
Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lewis Bolt and Nut Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lewis Bolt and Nut Company company.

In the current year, Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd company and Lewis Bolt and Nut Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd company nor Lewis Bolt and Nut Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd company nor Lewis Bolt and Nut Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd company nor Lewis Bolt and Nut Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lewis Bolt and Nut Company company nor Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lewis Bolt and Nut Company nor Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lewis Bolt and Nut Company company nor Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lewis Bolt and Nut Company company employs more people globally than Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Lewis Bolt and Nut Company nor Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lewis Bolt and Nut Company nor Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lewis Bolt and Nut Company nor Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lewis Bolt and Nut Company nor Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lewis Bolt and Nut Company nor Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lewis Bolt and Nut Company nor Australian Rail Technology Pty Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H