Comparison Overview

Lewis Stevenson

VS

Geek Chic

Lewis Stevenson

25 West 31st Street, New York, NY, 10001, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Lewis Stevenson is a leading furniture solutions provider serving businesses, organizations, and government agencies across the United States. Our history in the industry spans more than 40 years. We remain committed to the future of our industry and, as always, to creating the perfect space for our clients to operate thriving and successful businesses. Our team is made up of talented designers, skillful project managers, and caring sales professionals who each draw upon their unique insights and experiences to make Lewis Stevenson an innovative and reliable partner for our clients and manufacturers. Though we are passionate about our business, we are most enthusiastic about our commitment to providing unparalleled customer service. We strive to be accessible, dependable, and trustworthy, building lasting relationships with the companies we assist and seeing every project through to completion—and beyond. The modern workplace continues to evolve, but our client-first approach, now two decades strong, remains steadfast.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Geek Chic

711 100th St SE, Everett, 98208-3727, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Geek Chic has been making lifestyle furniture for geeks since 2008-- starting with gaming tables, and expanding into other geek needs like comic storage, collectibles display, and office retrofitting. Each heirloom quality piece is handcrafted by a small team of dedicated woodworkers in a shop just north of Seattle, WA. True to their name, Geek Chic aims to design, shape, and elevate the geek praxis.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lewis-stevenson.jpeg
Lewis Stevenson
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geek-chic.jpeg
Geek Chic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lewis Stevenson
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Geek Chic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lewis Stevenson in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Geek Chic in 2025.

Incident History — Lewis Stevenson (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lewis Stevenson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Geek Chic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Geek Chic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lewis-stevenson.jpeg
Lewis Stevenson
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geek-chic.jpeg
Geek Chic
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Geek Chic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lewis Stevenson company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Geek Chic company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lewis Stevenson company.

In the current year, Geek Chic company and Lewis Stevenson company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Geek Chic company nor Lewis Stevenson company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Geek Chic company nor Lewis Stevenson company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Geek Chic company nor Lewis Stevenson company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lewis Stevenson company nor Geek Chic company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lewis Stevenson nor Geek Chic holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lewis Stevenson company nor Geek Chic company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Geek Chic company employs more people globally than Lewis Stevenson company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Lewis Stevenson nor Geek Chic holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lewis Stevenson nor Geek Chic holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lewis Stevenson nor Geek Chic holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lewis Stevenson nor Geek Chic holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lewis Stevenson nor Geek Chic holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lewis Stevenson nor Geek Chic holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.