Comparison Overview

Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates

VS

Zajac LLC

Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates

415 Route 24, Chester, NJ, 07930, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates is a diversified acoustical engineering consulting firm offering professional services in the fields of architectural acoustics, building acoustics, noise evaluation and abatement including environmental, industrial and transportation, HVAC, vibration analysis and expert witness testimony. With more than 60 years of experience in providing consulting engineering services for a wide range of projects and clients, our engineering staff effectively interfaces with professionals in all disciplines. Our clients include corporations, developers, industrial organizations, architectural firms, engineering firms, educational institutions, attorneys, houses of worship, local municipalities and commercial enterprises. Our clients are important. LSG&A strives to develop a working relationship with our clients from the beginning of a project. In order to achieve client and project goals, modern instrumentation and computer modeling tools are used to accurately define problems. Our experienced and responsive professionals develop appropriate solutions that are both cost effective and practical.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Zajac LLC

92 Industrial Park Road, Saco, ME, 04072, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Zajac specializes in high purity liquid processing and packaging systems for the Food, Dairy, Pharmaceutical, Biotech and Personal Care industries. We offer the following in house services: - Process Engineering - Control systems and plant automation - Skid and process module fabrication - Field piping installation - Plant documentation - Packaging line design and integration. - Start up, calibration, and commissioning services We provide over 35 years of process and packaging design and integration expertise. As a turnkey solution provider, we have the ability to develop a project from concept through completion. Our clients rely on us for our process and packaging experience and our ability to deliver high quality results on fast track projects.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lewis-s.-goodfriend-&-associates.jpeg
Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zajac-llc.jpeg
Zajac LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Zajac LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zajac LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Zajac LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zajac LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lewis-s.-goodfriend-&-associates.jpeg
Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zajac-llc.jpeg
Zajac LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Zajac LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Zajac LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates company.

In the current year, Zajac LLC company and Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Zajac LLC company nor Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Zajac LLC company nor Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Zajac LLC company nor Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates company nor Zajac LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates nor Zajac LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates company nor Zajac LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Zajac LLC company employs more people globally than Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates nor Zajac LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates nor Zajac LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates nor Zajac LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates nor Zajac LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates nor Zajac LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates nor Zajac LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H