Comparison Overview

Lewis & Davidson, Ltd

VS

Morris Hall, PLLC

Lewis & Davidson, Ltd

One North Franklin Street, Chicago, 60606, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Lewis & Davidson, Ltd., pre-eminently rated workers' compensation and personal injury attorneys, has served Chicago for over 50 years. Our clients' interests are our priority and we provide personalized legal guidance at every step of your case, updating you on progress and fully informing you about the legal strategy and recovery options available. The legal process can be long and confusing; we can make it smoother and simpler.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Morris Hall, PLLC

7250 N 16th St, Phoenix, AZ, 85020, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

For over 50 years, Morris Hall (MH) has provided quality estate planning services for individuals and families in Arizona. MH is a charter member of the highly respected American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys (AAEPA). Ranking Arizona has named MH the Top Law Firm in Arizona for firms of 24 lawyers or fewer on multiple occasions, based on consumer voting. Offices located in Phoenix, Tucson, Prescott and 8 other communities throughout AZ. MH also offers free educational estate planning seminars and webinars throughout the year. Visit https://morrishall.com for more details.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Lewis & Davidson, Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morris-hall-pllc.jpeg
Morris Hall, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lewis & Davidson, Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Morris Hall, PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lewis & Davidson, Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Morris Hall, PLLC in 2025.

Incident History — Lewis & Davidson, Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lewis & Davidson, Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Morris Hall, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Morris Hall, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Lewis & Davidson, Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morris-hall-pllc.jpeg
Morris Hall, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lewis & Davidson, Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Morris Hall, PLLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Morris Hall, PLLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lewis & Davidson, Ltd company.

In the current year, Morris Hall, PLLC company and Lewis & Davidson, Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Morris Hall, PLLC company nor Lewis & Davidson, Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Morris Hall, PLLC company nor Lewis & Davidson, Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Morris Hall, PLLC company nor Lewis & Davidson, Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lewis & Davidson, Ltd company nor Morris Hall, PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lewis & Davidson, Ltd nor Morris Hall, PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lewis & Davidson, Ltd company nor Morris Hall, PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Morris Hall, PLLC company employs more people globally than Lewis & Davidson, Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Lewis & Davidson, Ltd nor Morris Hall, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lewis & Davidson, Ltd nor Morris Hall, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lewis & Davidson, Ltd nor Morris Hall, PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lewis & Davidson, Ltd nor Morris Hall, PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lewis & Davidson, Ltd nor Morris Hall, PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lewis & Davidson, Ltd nor Morris Hall, PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X