Comparison Overview

Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A.

VS

Lexical Labs

Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A.

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Law Offices of Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A., provide various legal services to the community, and our may clients, in the field or workers' compensation, personal injury, as well as a varied general practice, in order to better serve those who have asked for our help and assistance.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lexical Labs

London, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

YOUR VIRTUAL IN-HOUSE CONTRACT LAWYER Simplifying contract negotiation with intelligent review software. Our powerful AI driven contract analysis engine reads your contract. Smart UI guides you through the review process and allows you to generate a counter-proposal in minutes. Lexical Labs helps our customers negotiate high-volume contracts by automating the review of third-party contracts against business requirements, or a counterparty mark-up to a customer's own standard routine contracts. Our AI-enhanced contract review system can accelerate the negotiation of high-volume contracts by analysing our customers’ contracts against their playbook of legal and commercial issues and highlighting what is (and what is not) acceptable. Lexical Labs’ founding team has deep experience in the worlds of both technology and law. Combining expert legal systems with powerful AI algorithms to analyse each clause, we promote human and technology teamwork. Our powerful UI - designed by lawyers - guides the user through key concepts, locates text related to specific provisions, and provides detailed commentary to assist in legal review. Our cloud-based technology combines machine learning and logic techniques with codified legal expertise to analyse contract data to accelerate and transform the negotiation process.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lexicallabs.jpeg
Lexical Labs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lexical Labs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lexical Labs in 2025.

Incident History — Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lexical Labs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lexical Labs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lexicallabs.jpeg
Lexical Labs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lexical Labs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lexical Labs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A. company.

In the current year, Lexical Labs company and Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lexical Labs company nor Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lexical Labs company nor Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lexical Labs company nor Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A. company nor Lexical Labs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A. nor Lexical Labs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A. company nor Lexical Labs company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lexical Labs company employs more people globally than Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A. nor Lexical Labs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A. nor Lexical Labs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A. nor Lexical Labs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A. nor Lexical Labs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A. nor Lexical Labs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Levine, Busch & Schnepper, P.A. nor Lexical Labs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X