Comparison Overview

Levin & Brend, P.C.

VS

Gogozing Migration

Levin & Brend, P.C.

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

With more than 80 years of combined experience, Levin & Brend blend skills in matrimonial law, business valuations, forensic accounting and tax law. Our attorneys, who are also accountants, are prepared to address both the legalities of dissolving a marriage and the economic ramifications a couple faces, when their finances are complex. We are uniquely prepared to investigate and evaluate the value of assets in divorce cases, including stock portfolios, mutual funds, pension plans, 401Ks, real estate, closely held businesses, mortgages and loans. Our attorneys also handle business transactions and document changes brought about by divorce. In addition, certification as fraud examiners and business appraisers enable us to provide further dimension to the expertise we offer our clients. At Levin & Brend our clients have a distinct advantage. They do not have to seek outside professionals. Our in-house forensic accountants offer time saving and cost effective solutions – investigating a couple's network of finances, finding hidden assets and developing claims. And, when a divorce ends up in court, our forensic accountants are prepared to offer expert opinions, regarding their findings.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gogozing Migration

525 Collins St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Gogozing Migration is an independent Australian immigration agency based in Melbourne, Australia and Seoul, South Korea. We focus on providing high quality immigration services to businesses, families and individuals worldwide. Gogozing Migration was formed by Edward Rimmington. The company wants to emphasise the fact that we are a trustworthy, reliable and 100% consumer focused agency. Our business focuses on selecting the most effective yet practical strategy to achieving client's migration aims and provide advice in 'plain English'​ rather than legal jargon. We want to give you the best possible chance of success. The team is headed by Edward Rimmington, a registered Australian migration agent (MARN: 1688177) who prior to establishing Gogozing Migration, worked and lived in South Korea in the area of international business and consulting helping international businesses enter the South Korean Market. While living in South Korea, Edward had his own share of experiences dealing with migration matters in a different country. It was this experience that provided Edward with the inspiration to start up Gogozing Migration so he could help others with Migration matters in the future. With his in depth knowledge of international business and Australian Migration Law, combined with a friendly but frank and honest approach, Gogozing Migration aims to be your Migration solution partner. The term “Gogozing” means 'Let's go!'​ or 'Let's do it. This is a popular saying in South Korea with “Go” coming from English word “go” and “Zing” being the sound of someone heading towards their target. The “Gogozing Migration” brand is for people who want to go Australia then “Let’s go” or “Let’s do it”. There should not be anything stopping you from “Gogozing” to your destination.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/levin-&-brend-p-c-.jpeg
Levin & Brend, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gogozing-migration.jpeg
Gogozing Migration
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Levin & Brend, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gogozing Migration
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Levin & Brend, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gogozing Migration in 2025.

Incident History — Levin & Brend, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Levin & Brend, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gogozing Migration (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gogozing Migration cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/levin-&-brend-p-c-.jpeg
Levin & Brend, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gogozing-migration.jpeg
Gogozing Migration
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Levin & Brend, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gogozing Migration company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gogozing Migration company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Levin & Brend, P.C. company.

In the current year, Gogozing Migration company and Levin & Brend, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gogozing Migration company nor Levin & Brend, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gogozing Migration company nor Levin & Brend, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gogozing Migration company nor Levin & Brend, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Levin & Brend, P.C. company nor Gogozing Migration company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Levin & Brend, P.C. nor Gogozing Migration holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Levin & Brend, P.C. company nor Gogozing Migration company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Levin & Brend, P.C. company employs more people globally than Gogozing Migration company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Levin & Brend, P.C. nor Gogozing Migration holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Levin & Brend, P.C. nor Gogozing Migration holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Levin & Brend, P.C. nor Gogozing Migration holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Levin & Brend, P.C. nor Gogozing Migration holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Levin & Brend, P.C. nor Gogozing Migration holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Levin & Brend, P.C. nor Gogozing Migration holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X