Comparison Overview

Levi Strauss & Co.

VS

VF Corporation

Levi Strauss & Co.

1155 Battery St, None, San Francisco, California, US, None
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

You’re an original. So are we. We’re a company of people who like to forge our own path. We invented the blue jean in 1873, and we reinvented khaki pants in 1986. We pioneered labor and environmental guidelines in manufacturing. And we work to build sustainability into everything we do. We just might be the original startup. Our brands — Levi’s®, Dockers®, Beyond Yoga®, Denizen® and Signature by Levi Strauss & Co.™ — stand for freedom and self-expression around the world. And for more than 170 years, we’ve used the strength of our brands to lead with our values and make an outsized impact on the world. There’s plenty of room to make your mark here. We employ more than 15,000 people around the world, and this is a place where everyone contributes to the conversation. Levi Strauss & Co. is an equal opportunity employer and all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, gender, national origin, disability status, protected veteran status or any other characteristic protected by law.

NAICS: 448
NAICS Definition: Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees: 16,765
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

VF Corporation

VF Corporation, Denver, CO, US, 80202
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 0 and 549

VF Corporation is one of the world’s largest apparel, footwear and accessories companies connecting people to the lifestyles, activities and experiences they cherish most through a family of iconic outdoor, active and workwear brands including Vans®, The North Face®, Timberland® and Dickies®. Our purpose is to power movements of sustainable and active lifestyles for the betterment of people and our planet. We believe that when you discover the difference between a career and a calling, you get so much more out of life. When those lines begin to blur, you start to limit yourself much less and start aiming for more. That’s what we want for everyone who joins us at VF. And frankly, that’s what it takes to thrive here too. For more information, please visit vfc.com.

NAICS: 448
NAICS Definition: Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees: 28,984
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/levi-strauss-&-co-.jpeg
Levi Strauss & Co.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vf-corporation.jpeg
VF Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Levi Strauss & Co.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VF Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Levi Strauss & Co. in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

VF Corporation has 322.54% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Levi Strauss & Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Levi Strauss & Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VF Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VF Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/levi-strauss-&-co-.jpeg
Levi Strauss & Co.
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vf-corporation.jpeg
VF Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Motivation: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Levi Strauss & Co. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to VF Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

VF Corporation company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Levi Strauss & Co. company.

In the current year, VF Corporation company has reported more cyber incidents than Levi Strauss & Co. company.

Neither VF Corporation company nor Levi Strauss & Co. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both VF Corporation company and Levi Strauss & Co. company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

VF Corporation company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Levi Strauss & Co. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Levi Strauss & Co. company nor VF Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Levi Strauss & Co. nor VF Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Levi Strauss & Co. company nor VF Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

VF Corporation company employs more people globally than Levi Strauss & Co. company, reflecting its scale as a Retail Apparel and Fashion.

Neither Levi Strauss & Co. nor VF Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Levi Strauss & Co. nor VF Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Levi Strauss & Co. nor VF Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Levi Strauss & Co. nor VF Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Levi Strauss & Co. nor VF Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Levi Strauss & Co. nor VF Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H