Comparison Overview

Lettering Express

VS

TEAMEPS

Lettering Express

2130 W Reno Ave, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73107-7028, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Lettering Express provides businesses with the products they need to get noticed and be remembered. We’re a family-owned company that’s been around since 1986. With our decades of experience, you’ll be able to relax knowing your project is in expert hands. We have the perfect swag to leave a lasting impression, whether you're looking for a custom vehicle wrap, floor decals, new business cards, or a rad jacket embroidered with your logo. Our team of professional designers and installers brings a wealth of experience. Think of us as your trusty sidekick that makes you and your business look amazing.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TEAMEPS

None
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 800 and 849

For more than 21 years, TeamEPS has delivered on a promise: fast, dependable service for a wide range of prepress imaging systems from the world’s leading manufacturers of platesetters and print-on-demand solutions. As the largest, privately-owned and operated platesetter service provider in the United States, TeamEPS has serviced more than 1,000 customers around the world, helping them gain the maximum productivity, reliability and longevity from their prepress systems. TeamEPS partners with the world’s leading manufacturers and dealers to provide exceptional system service and support.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lettering-express.jpeg
Lettering Express
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/teameps.jpeg
TEAMEPS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lettering Express
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TEAMEPS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lettering Express in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TEAMEPS in 2025.

Incident History — Lettering Express (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lettering Express cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TEAMEPS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TEAMEPS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lettering-express.jpeg
Lettering Express
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/teameps.jpeg
TEAMEPS
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

TEAMEPS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lettering Express company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, TEAMEPS company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lettering Express company.

In the current year, TEAMEPS company and Lettering Express company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TEAMEPS company nor Lettering Express company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TEAMEPS company nor Lettering Express company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TEAMEPS company nor Lettering Express company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lettering Express company nor TEAMEPS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lettering Express nor TEAMEPS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lettering Express company nor TEAMEPS company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lettering Express company employs more people globally than TEAMEPS company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Lettering Express nor TEAMEPS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lettering Express nor TEAMEPS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lettering Express nor TEAMEPS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lettering Express nor TEAMEPS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lettering Express nor TEAMEPS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lettering Express nor TEAMEPS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N