Comparison Overview

LEONI

VS

Tenneco

LEONI

Marienstraße 5, Nürnberg, 90402, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

LEONI is a global provider of products, solutions and services for energy and data management in the automotive industry. The group of companies has around 87,000 employees in 21 countries and generated consolidated sales of EUR 5 billion in 2024. The partnership between LEONI and Luxshare Group has been effective since mid-2025. LEONI's largest customer group comprises the global car, commercial vehicle and component supply industry. The company is one of the world's largest suppliers of complex wiring systems and customer-specific cable harnesses. It’s value chain also comprises related components, from development to production. As an innovation partner with distinctive development and systems expertise, LEONI supports its customers on the path to increasingly sustainable and connected mobility concepts, from autonomous driving to alternative drives as well as charging systems. To this end, LEONI develops wiring systems that reduce complexity and enable higher levels of automation through zonal architecture, for example. Imprint: https://www.leoni.com/en/imprint/ Privacy statement: https://www.leoni.com/en/data-protection/

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 19,894
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tenneco

15701 Technology Dr., Northville, Michigan, 48168, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Driven by our Core Values and our winning mindset, we’re relentless in our pursuit to become the most trusted partner and best manufacturer and distributer to the transportation industry. Our employees are the changemakers of this ambition, bringing drive, passion and dedication to everything we do. And at the center of it all? Our customers – because when they win, we all win.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 26,718
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leoni.jpeg
LEONI
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tenneco.jpeg
Tenneco
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LEONI
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tenneco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LEONI in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tenneco in 2025.

Incident History — LEONI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LEONI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tenneco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tenneco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leoni.jpeg
LEONI
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tenneco.jpeg
Tenneco
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tenneco company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LEONI company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tenneco company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LEONI company.

In the current year, Tenneco company and LEONI company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tenneco company nor LEONI company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tenneco company nor LEONI company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tenneco company nor LEONI company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LEONI company nor Tenneco company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LEONI nor Tenneco holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tenneco company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to LEONI company.

Tenneco company employs more people globally than LEONI company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither LEONI nor Tenneco holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LEONI nor Tenneco holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LEONI nor Tenneco holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LEONI nor Tenneco holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LEONI nor Tenneco holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LEONI nor Tenneco holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H