Comparison Overview

Leo Photographer

VS

Studio 3, Inc.

Leo Photographer

undefined, undefined, undefined, 33132, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13

I have been doing photography for 15 year. I did art style photography, Commercial photography product shoot. I use natural and artificial light creating a natural ambient full of life. I teach photography and lighting amateur and pro level. I'm doing high-end wedding photography and I enjoy my art and also relationship I built with my clients. Privacy Policy 1. Introduction We value your privacy and are committed to protecting your personal information. This Privacy Policy outlines how we collect, use, and safeguard the data you provide to us. By interacting with us, you agree to the terms described below. 2. Information We Collect We collect the following types of information when you engage with us. o Profile Information: This includes your usemame, and any other details you choose to share in your bio. o Name, address, email and phone number. o Direct Messages: If you send us a direct message, we collect the content of your message 3. We use the collected information for the following purposes: • Using collected information to fulfill photography services and orders. • Communicating with clients regarding their photography needs, appointments, and orders. • Processing payments and invoices. • Sending promotional offers or newsletters with client consent. 4. Sharing Your Information We do not sell, rent, or share your personal information with third parties without your consent. However, please note that Instagram, and other platforms itself collects data as per its own Privacy Policy. 5. User Rights: As a user of our photography services, you have the following rights regarding your personal information: Right to Access Right to Rectification Right to Erasure Right to Restriction of Processing Right to Data Portability Right to Object 6. Data Security We take reasonable measures to protect your information from unauthorized access, loss, or misuse. 7. Changes to this Policy Any changes will be posted in here. 8. Contact Us [email protected]

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Studio 3, Inc.

P. O. Box 5063, Portland, OR, 97208, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Studio 3, Inc. sets the standard for advertising photography and videography with studios in the shadow of the Space Needle in Seattle and the quirky Eastside of Portland. We excel at product, food & drink, footwear, lifestyle, vehicle and technology photography and videography. We have creative expertise in our Pre-Media & Digital Art department and work to G7 color standards. Life is full of risks; don’t make visual assets one of them.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leo-photographer.jpeg
Leo Photographer
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-3.jpeg
Studio 3, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Leo Photographer
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Studio 3, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Leo Photographer in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio 3, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Leo Photographer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Leo Photographer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Studio 3, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio 3, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leo-photographer.jpeg
Leo Photographer
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-3.jpeg
Studio 3, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Studio 3, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Leo Photographer company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Studio 3, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Leo Photographer company.

In the current year, Studio 3, Inc. company and Leo Photographer company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Studio 3, Inc. company nor Leo Photographer company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Studio 3, Inc. company nor Leo Photographer company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Studio 3, Inc. company nor Leo Photographer company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Leo Photographer company nor Studio 3, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Leo Photographer nor Studio 3, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Leo Photographer company nor Studio 3, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Studio 3, Inc. company employs more people globally than Leo Photographer company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Leo Photographer nor Studio 3, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Leo Photographer nor Studio 3, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Leo Photographer nor Studio 3, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Leo Photographer nor Studio 3, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Leo Photographer nor Studio 3, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Leo Photographer nor Studio 3, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N