Comparison Overview

Lenox Hill Hospital

VS

Cincinnati Children's

Lenox Hill Hospital

100 East 77th Street, New York, 10075, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.lenoxhill.northwell.edu

Lenox Hill Hospital is a 450-bed, acute care hospital located on Manhattan's Upper East Side. A staple in the community for more than 150 years, the hospital has earned a national reputation for outstanding patient care and innovative medical and surgical treatments. The mission of Lenox Hill Hospital is to deliver outstanding healthcare with compassion and respect, to promote wellness in its communities, and to advance the field of medicine through education and research.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 3,119
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Cincinnati Children's

US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cincinnatichildrens.org/

Cincinnati Children’s, a nonprofit academic medical center established in 1883, offers services from well-child care to treatment for the most rare and complex conditions. It is the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine and trains more than 600 residents and clinical fellows each year. Cincinnati Children’s is a force in pediatric research and offers some of the best research-based education and training programs in the nation. Cincinnati Children’s is proud to be an Equal Opportunity Employer committed to creating an environment of dignity and respect for all our employees, patients, and families. All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, genetic information, national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability or protected veteran status. EEO/Veteran/Disability

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 16,223
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lenox-hill-hospital.jpeg
Lenox Hill Hospital
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnatichildrens.jpeg
Cincinnati Children's
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lenox Hill Hospital
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cincinnati Children's
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lenox Hill Hospital in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cincinnati Children's in 2026.

Incident History — Lenox Hill Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lenox Hill Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cincinnati Children's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cincinnati Children's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lenox-hill-hospital.jpeg
Lenox Hill Hospital
Incidents

Date Detected: 09/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unknown
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnatichildrens.jpeg
Cincinnati Children's
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cincinnati Children's company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lenox Hill Hospital company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Lenox Hill Hospital company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Cincinnati Children's company has not reported any.

In the current year, Cincinnati Children's company and Lenox Hill Hospital company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cincinnati Children's company nor Lenox Hill Hospital company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Lenox Hill Hospital company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Cincinnati Children's company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Cincinnati Children's company nor Lenox Hill Hospital company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lenox Hill Hospital company nor Cincinnati Children's company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lenox Hill Hospital nor Cincinnati Children's holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Lenox Hill Hospital company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cincinnati Children's company.

Cincinnati Children's company employs more people globally than Lenox Hill Hospital company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Lenox Hill Hospital nor Cincinnati Children's holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lenox Hill Hospital nor Cincinnati Children's holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lenox Hill Hospital nor Cincinnati Children's holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lenox Hill Hospital nor Cincinnati Children's holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lenox Hill Hospital nor Cincinnati Children's holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lenox Hill Hospital nor Cincinnati Children's holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References