Comparison Overview

Lenovo

VS

AlmavivA Group

Lenovo

8001 Development Dr, None, Morrisville, NC, US, 27560
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 750 and 799

Lenovo is a US$69 billion revenue global technology powerhouse, ranked #196 in the Fortune Global 500, and serving millions of customers every day in 180 markets. Focused on a bold vision to deliver Smarter Technology for All, Lenovo has built on its success as the world’s largest PC company with a full-stack portfolio of AI-enabled, AI-ready, and AI-optimized devices (PCs, workstations, smartphones, tablets), infrastructure (server, storage, edge, high performance computing and software defined infrastructure), software, solutions, and services. Lenovo’s continued investment in world-changing innovation is building a more equitable, trustworthy, and smarter future for everyone, everywhere. Lenovo is listed on the Hong Kong stock exchange under Lenovo Group Limited (HKSE: 992) (ADR: LNVGY). To find out more visit https://www.lenovo.com, and read about the latest news via our StoryHub at https://news.lenovo.com/. To learn more about our career opportunities, visit our careers page at http://jobs.lenovo.com/.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

AlmavivA Group

Via di Casal Boccone, 188-190, Roma, IT, 00137
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Almaviva is synonymous with digital innovation. Proven experience, unique skills, ongoing research and in-depth knowledge of a range of public and private market sectors are what make it the leading Italian Group in Information & Communications Technology. Almaviva leads the Country growth and takes up the challenge that companies must face to remain competitive in the Absolute Digital Age, by innovating their business model, organization, enterprise culture and ICT. With 41,000 people - 7,000 in Italy and 34,000 overseas - Almaviva is the 3rd private Italian Group in terms of people worldwide, with a turnover of € 1.411 million in 2024. Almaviva Group operates globally, with 44 offices in Italy and 35 abroad. It has a significant presence in Brazil, and is also operational in the United States, Colombia, Egypt, Finland, the Dominican Republic, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Tunisia, and Brussels, the nerve center of the EU. Since 2015 Almaviva is a partner of the world's largest corporate sustainability initiative, UN Global Compact.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 47,385
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lenovo.jpeg
Lenovo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/almaviva-group.jpeg
AlmavivA Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lenovo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AlmavivA Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Lenovo has 33.33% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AlmavivA Group in 2025.

Incident History — Lenovo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lenovo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AlmavivA Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AlmavivA Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lenovo.jpeg
Lenovo
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Malicious Prompt Injection (400-character payload)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: UEFI Secure Boot Bypass
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2019
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Alternate Data Streams (ADS)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/almaviva-group.jpeg
AlmavivA Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lenovo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AlmavivA Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Lenovo company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas AlmavivA Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Lenovo company has reported more cyber incidents than AlmavivA Group company.

Neither AlmavivA Group company nor Lenovo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AlmavivA Group company nor Lenovo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AlmavivA Group company nor Lenovo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Lenovo company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while AlmavivA Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Lenovo nor AlmavivA Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

AlmavivA Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lenovo company.

AlmavivA Group company employs more people globally than Lenovo company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Lenovo nor AlmavivA Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lenovo nor AlmavivA Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lenovo nor AlmavivA Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lenovo nor AlmavivA Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lenovo nor AlmavivA Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lenovo nor AlmavivA Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N