Comparison Overview

Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP

VS

Stratos Legal

Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP

135 Main St, San Francisco, California, 94105, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The attorneys of Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP combine their skills in business, family law, real estate, corporate, business litigation, alternate dispute resolution, community banking, general counsel services, labor, employment, taxation, intellectual property, and estate planning matters to serve the varied and changing needs of clients ranging from sole proprietors to national banking institutions. As a full-service civil law firm, our lawyers of exceptional credentials extend the tradition of our founding partners to advance and protect the interests of clients facing difficult economic, professional and personal challenges. We pride ourselves on our responsiveness and accessibility to clients and encourage close working relationships between partners and associates, lawyers and staff, or attorneys and clients. We can therefore offer an integrated team approach that not only provides sound legal advice, but that also helps achieve the optimum practical result for our clients. To learn how our practice can advance your business or personal objectives, please contact us via 415-957-1800 or www.lpslaw.com.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stratos Legal

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 800 and 849

Stratos Legal was founded by legal professionals for legal professionals. Our management and staff have worked at all levels of the legal industry – from attorneys to paralegals to court reporters to past owners of litigation support companies. We have built a dedicated team that is passionate about our business and our clients’ needs. Stratos has quickly grown into a nationwide, full-service, litigation support firm. We not only pride ourselves on our customer service, but we place a high premium on keeping up with the latest technologies so that we can deliver cost-management solutions to our clients.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leland-parachini-steinberg-matzger-&-melnick-llp.jpeg
Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stratos Legal
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stratos Legal in 2025.

Incident History — Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stratos Legal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stratos Legal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leland-parachini-steinberg-matzger-&-melnick-llp.jpeg
Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Stratos Legal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stratos Legal company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stratos Legal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP company.

In the current year, Stratos Legal company and Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stratos Legal company nor Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stratos Legal company nor Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stratos Legal company nor Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP company nor Stratos Legal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP nor Stratos Legal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP company nor Stratos Legal company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP company employs more people globally than Stratos Legal company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP nor Stratos Legal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP nor Stratos Legal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP nor Stratos Legal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP nor Stratos Legal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP nor Stratos Legal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick LLP nor Stratos Legal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X