Comparison Overview

LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED

VS

Gaming Support

LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED

UNIT 3 MALMO PARK MALMO ROAD, HULL, EAST YORKSHIRE HU7 0YF, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Leisure Electronics provide a "one-stop"​ solution tailored to each individual customers needs encompassing design, manufacture, installation and maintenance of bingo equipment to all sectors of the gaming industry. From fit out to refurbishment, Leisure Electronics provide a low cost, comprehensive and integrated service. The Leisure Electronics offer can also be complemented by our sister company, Wexel Gaming, who specialise in digital gaming solutions.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gaming Support

Industrieweg 29, Rotterdam, 3044 AS, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 2000, Gaming Support designs and manufactures innovative products and technology solutions for the global gaming industry. Its product line includes the BonusBox slot bonusing product, jackpot controllers, and the gaming industry’s leading media system specifically developed to broadcast the excitement and joy of players winning. The Company’s products also include the world’s first Slim line range of lightweight gaming signs, Standard casino signs, and LED displays. Casino Services delivered by Gaming Support are based on its decades of experience installing, maintaining and refurbishing all 14 of the casinos operated by Holland Casino; this means that every day of the year, it looks after 7,000 or so gaming machines, almost 500 live tables, and all the peripheral equipment essential to operate these machines and tables. Please take a look at our Products pages on LinkedIn or visit our website to find out more about Gaming Support; and feel free to contact us with any queries. You can follow us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/GamingSupport.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 86
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leisure-electronics-limited.jpeg
LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gaming-support.jpeg
Gaming Support
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gaming Support
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gaming Support in 2025.

Incident History — LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gaming Support (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gaming Support cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leisure-electronics-limited.jpeg
LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gaming-support.jpeg
Gaming Support
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED company and Gaming Support company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Gaming Support company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED company.

In the current year, Gaming Support company and LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gaming Support company nor LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gaming Support company nor LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gaming Support company nor LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED company nor Gaming Support company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED nor Gaming Support holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED company nor Gaming Support company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gaming Support company employs more people globally than LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED nor Gaming Support holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED nor Gaming Support holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED nor Gaming Support holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED nor Gaming Support holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED nor Gaming Support holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LEISURE ELECTRONICS LIMITED nor Gaming Support holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H