Comparison Overview

LEGALLANDS LLP

VS

Bradbury Sheerin

LEGALLANDS LLP

Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

We, LEGALLANDS, are a Legal 500 full-service Law firm based in New Delhi, India having an international presence in the United States of America (LEGALLANDS INC.) and United Arab Emirates (LEGALLANDS LLC FZ). Our areas of expertise include Business Set up and Management Services, Contract, Conveyancing, and Corporate Services, International Taxation & Trade Facilitation (DTAA), Joint Ventures, Foreign Collaborations, Technology Transfer Services, IPRs, Immigration, Corporate Structuring, International Dispute Resolution including Arbitration & Political Liaison, Licenses and Approvals in India and Abroad having representation in various countries of the world.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bradbury Sheerin

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Bradbury Sheerin is a Hampshire based legal and HR consultancy. Our experienced team is made up of seasoned legal and HR consultants who have worked for over 25 years in leading UK firms. We develop long term relationships with our clients and our expertise will help you to successfully navigate a minefield of commercial, legal, HR and regulatory issues. Our legal consultants offer dedicated, partner level service at a substantially lower cost than traditional, private practice law firms. Our clients find us practical, insightful and approachable so, if you are facing legal/HR challenges in your business please do contact us.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legallands.jpeg
LEGALLANDS LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bradbury-sheerin.jpeg
Bradbury Sheerin
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LEGALLANDS LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bradbury Sheerin
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LEGALLANDS LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bradbury Sheerin in 2025.

Incident History — LEGALLANDS LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LEGALLANDS LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bradbury Sheerin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bradbury Sheerin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legallands.jpeg
LEGALLANDS LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bradbury-sheerin.jpeg
Bradbury Sheerin
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bradbury Sheerin company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LEGALLANDS LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bradbury Sheerin company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LEGALLANDS LLP company.

In the current year, Bradbury Sheerin company and LEGALLANDS LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bradbury Sheerin company nor LEGALLANDS LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bradbury Sheerin company nor LEGALLANDS LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bradbury Sheerin company nor LEGALLANDS LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LEGALLANDS LLP company nor Bradbury Sheerin company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LEGALLANDS LLP nor Bradbury Sheerin holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither LEGALLANDS LLP company nor Bradbury Sheerin company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LEGALLANDS LLP company employs more people globally than Bradbury Sheerin company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither LEGALLANDS LLP nor Bradbury Sheerin holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LEGALLANDS LLP nor Bradbury Sheerin holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LEGALLANDS LLP nor Bradbury Sheerin holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LEGALLANDS LLP nor Bradbury Sheerin holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LEGALLANDS LLP nor Bradbury Sheerin holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LEGALLANDS LLP nor Bradbury Sheerin holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X