Comparison Overview

Legal Technology Services

VS

Kingsley Wood

Legal Technology Services

4470 Atlanta Hwy, Loganville, 30052, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Legal Technology Services provides the legal community with a reliable resource for Video, Graphics/Boards and Trial Presentation. We also produce the webinar component for seminars. Our video department provides Depositions (remote and in person), "Day in the Life"​ videos, Settlement Documentaries, Site Inspections and Marketing Videos. LTS prepares lawyers for trial by printing their exhibits, creating custom graphics, PowerPoint Presentations & Timelines as well as large format printing for foam boards. LTS has experience you can count on. With our professional videographers, we bring real world know-how to your cases. Our experienced trial technicians utilize safeguards for database protection, strategic equipment placement and the latest in digital trial technology to effectively communicate with your jury.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kingsley Wood

69 Carter Lane, None, London, England, GB, None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

We are on a mission to radically reshape the way legal services are delivered to individuals, entrepreneurs and commercial leaders. We’ll do that by bringing together a diverse range of legal minds, liberate them from the usual challenges of institutional private practice and equip them with the tools, incentives and purpose to operate in a way that serves their clients better than anyone else. We have created THE legal platform for the modern lawyer, those who want to work as part of a specialised legal community, in an environment where the challenges and restraints most commonly associated with the legal sector, do not exist. We recognise that our Partners require excellent technology & systems, as well as matter resourcing (secretarial and paralegal), a finely tuned operational and financial set up, and above all a commercial model that accurately recognises their skills, contacts and experience to allow them to truly realise the value of every matter for the first time. They do this, as part of a wider community of legal specialists, working together as individuals.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kingsley-wood.jpeg
Kingsley Wood
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Legal Technology Services
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kingsley Wood
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legal Technology Services in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kingsley Wood in 2025.

Incident History — Legal Technology Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legal Technology Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kingsley Wood (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kingsley Wood cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legal-technology-services.jpeg
Legal Technology Services
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kingsley-wood.jpeg
Kingsley Wood
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Legal Technology Services company and Kingsley Wood company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Kingsley Wood company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Legal Technology Services company.

In the current year, Kingsley Wood company and Legal Technology Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kingsley Wood company nor Legal Technology Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kingsley Wood company nor Legal Technology Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kingsley Wood company nor Legal Technology Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Legal Technology Services company nor Kingsley Wood company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Legal Technology Services nor Kingsley Wood holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Legal Technology Services company nor Kingsley Wood company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kingsley Wood company employs more people globally than Legal Technology Services company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Legal Technology Services nor Kingsley Wood holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Legal Technology Services nor Kingsley Wood holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Legal Technology Services nor Kingsley Wood holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Legal Technology Services nor Kingsley Wood holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Legal Technology Services nor Kingsley Wood holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Legal Technology Services nor Kingsley Wood holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X