Comparison Overview

Legal Services Alabama

VS

APJ Solicitors

Legal Services Alabama

2567 Fairlane Drive, Suite 300, None, Montgomery, Alabama, US, 36116
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Legal Services Alabama (LSA) serves low-income people by providing civil legal aid and by promoting collaboration to find solutions to problems of poverty from eight offices located in: Anniston, Birmingham, Dothan, Huntsville, Mobile, Montgomery, Selma and Tuscaloosa. Legal Services Alabama provides free legal aid and assistance to low-income Alabamians in all 67 counties of the state. LSA is the only non-profit law firm providing civil legal assistance to low-income Alabamians and the only LSC-funded program in Alabama. LSA helps low-income Alabamians with domestic violence issues, food stamps, Medicaid, bankruptcy, foreclosure, evictions, garnishments, FEMA disputes, debt settlements and other civil legal matters.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 111
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

APJ Solicitors

APJ Solicitors, Warrington, Daresbury, WA1 1RW, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

APJ Solicitors is a team of experts dedicated to investigating, negotiating and settling a broad range of claims against a wide variety of financial services providers. Our specialist solicitors only undertake this type of work which means they are solely focussed on this area of law and are completely familiar with all the issues that surround the mis-selling of financial products. Our team have over 40 years’ experience in challenging banks, advisors, lenders and investment providers regarding their negligent advice and services. Our technical expertise underpins our drive and determination to fight hard for your rights and acquire financial redress. We are client-orientated with a forward-thinking approach to providing expert legal advice to ensure that we support you efficiently and effectively, ensuring your journey is seamless from beginning to end.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anthony-philip-james-&-co-ltd.jpeg
APJ Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Legal Services Alabama
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
APJ Solicitors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legal Services Alabama in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for APJ Solicitors in 2025.

Incident History — Legal Services Alabama (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legal Services Alabama cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — APJ Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

APJ Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legal-services-alabama.jpeg
Legal Services Alabama
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anthony-philip-james-&-co-ltd.jpeg
APJ Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Legal Services Alabama company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to APJ Solicitors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, APJ Solicitors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Legal Services Alabama company.

In the current year, APJ Solicitors company and Legal Services Alabama company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither APJ Solicitors company nor Legal Services Alabama company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither APJ Solicitors company nor Legal Services Alabama company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither APJ Solicitors company nor Legal Services Alabama company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Legal Services Alabama company nor APJ Solicitors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Legal Services Alabama nor APJ Solicitors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Legal Services Alabama company nor APJ Solicitors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Legal Services Alabama company employs more people globally than APJ Solicitors company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Legal Services Alabama nor APJ Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Legal Services Alabama nor APJ Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Legal Services Alabama nor APJ Solicitors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Legal Services Alabama nor APJ Solicitors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Legal Services Alabama nor APJ Solicitors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Legal Services Alabama nor APJ Solicitors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X