Comparison Overview

Legal Fee Advisors™

VS

Ethics Matter

Legal Fee Advisors™

41 East 11th Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY, 10003, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Legal Fee Advisors™ is a group of highly experienced attorneys and legal fee analysts working hard to make sure that clients only pay fair, ethical legal fees. Legal bills can be highly complex and few clients have the time, resources or expertise to ensure that outside counsel are in compliance with corporate best practices and are operating within accepted ethical and legal guidelines. For more than 30 years, the experts at Legal Fee Advisors™ have been helping companies investigate and remedy improper practices, transform billing practices and manage legal costs. We also provide expert testimony to support client’s positions in legal fee litigation. Through our consultancy, auditing and expert testimony practices, our group of highly experienced attorneys, analysts and internationally recognized Legal Fee Experts enable clients to identify questionable historical legal charges, and avoid future problems as well. Core Services: • Billing Guidelines & Standards • Legal Fee Consulting & Auditing • Forensic Auditing: Investigating Historical Billing Issues • Expert Testimony & Dispute Resolution

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ethics Matter

undefined, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560061, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

At Ethics Matter, we lead the way in ethical compliances, offering an all-inclusive solution to POSH and POCSO compliance. We provide an entire suite of services ranging from documentation to training and legal advisory as External Members. Our lawyers also help organisations and individuals in case of appeals/legal disputes relating to POSH and POCSO. We go beyond the conventional with arts-based therapies for holistic counseling sessions for victims, falsely accused, and their families. We provide our services PAN India, through both in-person and virtual modes. We look at the law differently. Our sublime approach to legal compliance incorporates some of the proven industry best-practices along with moral best-practices in line with the law. Partnering with Ethics Matter would mean partnering with the best legal minds of the country.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ethics-matter.jpeg
Ethics Matter
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Legal Fee Advisors™
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ethics Matter
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legal Fee Advisors™ in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ethics Matter in 2025.

Incident History — Legal Fee Advisors™ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legal Fee Advisors™ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ethics Matter (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ethics Matter cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legal-fee-advisors.jpeg
Legal Fee Advisors™
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ethics-matter.jpeg
Ethics Matter
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Legal Fee Advisors™ company and Ethics Matter company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Ethics Matter company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Legal Fee Advisors™ company.

In the current year, Ethics Matter company and Legal Fee Advisors™ company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ethics Matter company nor Legal Fee Advisors™ company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ethics Matter company nor Legal Fee Advisors™ company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ethics Matter company nor Legal Fee Advisors™ company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Legal Fee Advisors™ company nor Ethics Matter company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Legal Fee Advisors™ nor Ethics Matter holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Legal Fee Advisors™ company nor Ethics Matter company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Legal Fee Advisors™ company employs more people globally than Ethics Matter company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Legal Fee Advisors™ nor Ethics Matter holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Legal Fee Advisors™ nor Ethics Matter holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Legal Fee Advisors™ nor Ethics Matter holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Legal Fee Advisors™ nor Ethics Matter holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Legal Fee Advisors™ nor Ethics Matter holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Legal Fee Advisors™ nor Ethics Matter holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X