Comparison Overview

LegalEdge

VS

Dodd DelCollo

LegalEdge

Moor Place, London, undefined, EC2Y 9DT, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

LegalEdge is a practical, affordable legal solution for growing companies. We work very differently to law firms, whose approach can be too complex, expensive and/or impractical. We don’t do lengthy negotiations or contracts, and we don’t put the clock on and leave it on. We simply help businesses keep control of risk, workflow, priorities and budget by: - Managing legal budgets and strategy efficiently - Simplifying contracts and processes to bring in customers and revenue faster - Protecting your brand and other key assets - Helping add new products, services or technology quickly and smoothly - Streamlining policies to make hiring, retaining and incentivising staff easier - Getting legal processes running better to reduce risk Our team of flexible in-house lawyers have all worked inside companies as part of the ops team. So prioritise and get on with what’s important. Get in touch to find out how LegalEdge can help you at [email protected]

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dodd DelCollo

29 Broadway, Suite 2311, New York, NY, 10006, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Dodd DelCollo is a law firm purposely designed to deliver legal services with significantly greater efficiency, consistency, and added value. By deconstructing and refining traditional legal processes, applying workflow technology, and collecting and analyzing data, our firm is transforming the way legal services are delivered today. With an unrivaled combination of disciplined processes, technology expertise, and business leadership, Dodd DelCollo clients benefit from reduced total legal spend, improved quality, enhanced transparency, actionable insight, simplified management of outside counsel, and increased control. For more information, visit DoddDelcollo.com.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legal-edge-llp.jpeg
LegalEdge
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hickey-smith-llp.jpeg
Dodd DelCollo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LegalEdge
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dodd DelCollo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LegalEdge in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dodd DelCollo in 2025.

Incident History — LegalEdge (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LegalEdge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dodd DelCollo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dodd DelCollo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legal-edge-llp.jpeg
LegalEdge
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hickey-smith-llp.jpeg
Dodd DelCollo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both LegalEdge company and Dodd DelCollo company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Dodd DelCollo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LegalEdge company.

In the current year, Dodd DelCollo company and LegalEdge company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dodd DelCollo company nor LegalEdge company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dodd DelCollo company nor LegalEdge company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dodd DelCollo company nor LegalEdge company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LegalEdge company nor Dodd DelCollo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LegalEdge nor Dodd DelCollo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither LegalEdge company nor Dodd DelCollo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LegalEdge company employs more people globally than Dodd DelCollo company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither LegalEdge nor Dodd DelCollo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LegalEdge nor Dodd DelCollo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LegalEdge nor Dodd DelCollo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LegalEdge nor Dodd DelCollo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LegalEdge nor Dodd DelCollo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LegalEdge nor Dodd DelCollo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X