Comparison Overview

Legal Answers LLP

VS

Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate

Legal Answers LLP

4 Olabode George Street, Lagos , Lagos, 100001, NG
Last Update: 2025-11-27

LEGAL ANSWERS LLP (The firm) is a Corporate and Commercial law firm based in Nigeria. We offer premium legal and business advisory services to top-tier clients on a wide range of issues which cut across various sectors domestically and across border. The firm’s strategy is to provide our clients with effective outsourced legal solutions, in our capacity as external solicitors. We are very passionate about providing bespoke services to our clientele, which includes individuals, large corporations, small and medium scale enterprises. Our driving force is to ensure that all legal risks are mitigated, thus ensuring efficiency and growth. We strive to fully understand our clients’ needs and to meet those needs efficiently in terms of quality of work, turnaround time and cost. The Legal Answers team comprises of dynamic lawyers with requisite skill set, sound knowledge and have acquired significant experience experience in rendering premium legal services especially in the area of corporate commercial transactions, litigation and dispute resolution.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate

601 California St, Ste 1900, San Francisco, California, 94108, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Rowan Patents is an integrated platform that provides the elements to draft a patent – claims, drawings, and specification – in one tool, synchronized and linked together to ensure consistency. It helps professionals write patents more efficiently, with fewer errors and better quality, and reduces tedious, time-consuming tasks so they can focus on drafting meaningful patents.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rowan-tels-corp.jpeg
Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Legal Answers LLP
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legal Answers LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate in 2025.

Incident History — Legal Answers LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legal Answers LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legal-answers-llp.jpeg
Legal Answers LLP
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rowan-tels-corp.jpeg
Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Legal Answers LLP company and Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Legal Answers LLP company.

In the current year, Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate company and Legal Answers LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate company nor Legal Answers LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate company nor Legal Answers LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate company nor Legal Answers LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Legal Answers LLP company nor Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Legal Answers LLP nor Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Legal Answers LLP company.

Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate company employs more people globally than Legal Answers LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Legal Answers LLP nor Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Legal Answers LLP nor Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Legal Answers LLP nor Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Legal Answers LLP nor Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Legal Answers LLP nor Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Legal Answers LLP nor Rowan Patents, part of Clarivate holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X