Comparison Overview

Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC)

VS

King & Fisher

Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC)

1832 Second St, Berkeley, California, 94710, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC) is the statewide membership organization of legal services nonprofits. By advocating for more funding and better laws for legal nonprofits and their clients, LAAC serves as the unified voice of legal services in California. LAAC also facilitates collaboration among nonprofit attorneys across the state. The core of LAAC's membership are the 100 nonprofits funded through IOLTA (Interest on Lawyer Trust Account) grants by the State Bar of California. Capitalizing on its structure as a membership organization, LAAC naturally takes on the role of advocating on behalf of this group of nonprofits. LAAC facilitates communication and coordination between programs, trains in core substantive areas, analyzes best practices, and assesses and improves the effectiveness of the delivery of legal aid in California, including working strategically to support rural and small programs and meet the needs of underserved populations.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

King & Fisher

Three Galleria Tower, Dallas, Texas, 75240, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

King & Fisher is a unique law firm focused exclusively on outsourcing, technology transactions, and business contracts. Our partners each have more than 20 years of experience handling technology, outsourcing and other commercial transactions for many of the world’s leading technology companies and their customers, including Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Facebook, Quicken Loans, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Wal-Mart, Xerox, CNET, American Airlines, AT&T, Samsung, Verizon Wireless, Hewlett-Packard, Sprint, Salesforce.com, Match.com, eBay, Rackspace, and DuPont, just to name a few. We work with all types of clients, from start-ups, to established small and medium-sized companies, to Fortune 10 companies. We understand the need to balance the legal and business demands and risks to get a deal done. Representative types of transactions include Software Licenses, Software as a Service (SaaS) and other Cloud Contracts, Outsourcing Agreements (IT and BPO), Service Levels, Development Agreements, Implementation Agreements, Integration Agreements, Hardware Acquisition, Website Agreements, Manufacturing Agreements, Nondisclosure Agreements, Copyrights, Big Data, Advertising, Trademarks, Disaster Recovery / Business Continuity, Service Agreements, Privacy Issues, Mobile App Agreements, Open Source Issues, and Trade Secrets.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/king-fisher.jpeg
King & Fisher
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC)
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
King & Fisher
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC) in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for King & Fisher in 2025.

Incident History — Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — King & Fisher (X = Date, Y = Severity)

King & Fisher cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legal-aid-association-of-california-laac-.jpeg
Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC)
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/king-fisher.jpeg
King & Fisher
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

King & Fisher company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, King & Fisher company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC) company.

In the current year, King & Fisher company and Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither King & Fisher company nor Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither King & Fisher company nor Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither King & Fisher company nor Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC) company nor King & Fisher company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC) nor King & Fisher holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC) company nor King & Fisher company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC) company employs more people globally than King & Fisher company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC) nor King & Fisher holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC) nor King & Fisher holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC) nor King & Fisher holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC) nor King & Fisher holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC) nor King & Fisher holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Legal Aid Association of California (LAAC) nor King & Fisher holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X