Comparison Overview

Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz

VS

Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation

Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz

618 Church Street, Nashville, 37219, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Bankruptcy Is Not The End. It Is The Beginning. For more than 35 years, our lawyers have secured debt relief and peace of mind for corporate and consumer bankruptcy clients throughout the state. We have helped local individuals and businesses, nationally known celebrities, multimillion-dollar corporations, as well as regular, hardworking individuals to get out of debt and stay out of it permanently. Our services include the following: • Chapter 7 bankruptcy to eliminate unsecured debts for consumers and small-business owners • Chapter 11 bankruptcy for reorganizing corporations and eliminating business debts • Chapter 12 bankruptcy for family farmers and fishermen • Chapter 13 bankruptcy to eliminate debts while enabling filers to continue paying on mortgages and other secured debts

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation

111 E Front St, Hattiesburg, 39401, US
Last Update: 2025-11-29

The Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation (MCLSC) provides free civil legal assistance to eligible low income individuals within a forty-three (43) county service area in Central and Southern Mississippi. MCLSC was chartered on May 1, 2004 and combines five (5) historic legal aid programs: Central Mississippi Legal Services (CMLS), Southwest Mississippi Legal Services (SWMLS), East Mississippi Legal Services (EMLS), South Mississippi Legal Services (SMLS) and Southeast Mississippi Legal Services (SEMLS). The administrative office is located in Hattiesburg, MS. There are five (5) service offices, which are located in Jackson, McComb, Hattiesburg, Meridian, and Gulfport.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lefkovitz-&-lefkovitz.jpeg
Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lefkovitz-&-lefkovitz.jpeg
Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ms-center-for-legal-services-corporation.jpeg
Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation
Incidents

FAQ

Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz company has not reported any.

In the current year, Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation company and Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation company nor Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation company nor Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz company nor Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz nor Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz company nor Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation company employs more people globally than Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz nor Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz nor Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz nor Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz nor Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz nor Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz nor Mississippi Center for Legal Services Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X