Comparison Overview

Lefavor Envelope Company

VS

AntiDesigns

Lefavor Envelope Company

2550 South 900 West, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84119, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

Lefavor Envelope Company is a woman-owned business in operation since 1965. We have the latest envelope manufacturing and printing equipment that allows us to give you the best quality and versatility on your envelope needs. We run in-line (flexo) printing, jet printing (litho quality) and multi-color printing with full coverage. We can cater to all types of envelope styles. We have the ability to run small 1,000 pc. orders to orders in the millions. We specialize in custom sizes, custom windows, especially 9 x 12 and 10 x 13 with and without windows. View our Product List on our website to see all the different envelopes that we manufacture and sell. We have the capability of adding latex gumming or peel-n-seal to most envelope sizes. Let us help you with design styles and help you create the most effective and economical mail piece to fit your needs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

AntiDesigns

570 e 1st st, boston, ma, 02127, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

AntiDesigns is Boston's artist-centric screen print shop. Servicing clothing brands, bands, small business and music labels since 2004, we have been hand printing custom t-shirts and posters for years. We specialize in short production runs but can do thousands of units as well, both with a short turnaround. We offer next day service too - contact us with any questions: 617-765-8239

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lefavor-envelope-company.jpeg
Lefavor Envelope Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/antidesigns.jpeg
AntiDesigns
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lefavor Envelope Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AntiDesigns
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lefavor Envelope Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AntiDesigns in 2025.

Incident History — Lefavor Envelope Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lefavor Envelope Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AntiDesigns (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AntiDesigns cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lefavor-envelope-company.jpeg
Lefavor Envelope Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/antidesigns.jpeg
AntiDesigns
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AntiDesigns company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lefavor Envelope Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, AntiDesigns company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lefavor Envelope Company company.

In the current year, AntiDesigns company and Lefavor Envelope Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AntiDesigns company nor Lefavor Envelope Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AntiDesigns company nor Lefavor Envelope Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AntiDesigns company nor Lefavor Envelope Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lefavor Envelope Company company nor AntiDesigns company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lefavor Envelope Company nor AntiDesigns holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lefavor Envelope Company company nor AntiDesigns company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lefavor Envelope Company company employs more people globally than AntiDesigns company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Lefavor Envelope Company nor AntiDesigns holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lefavor Envelope Company nor AntiDesigns holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lefavor Envelope Company nor AntiDesigns holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lefavor Envelope Company nor AntiDesigns holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lefavor Envelope Company nor AntiDesigns holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lefavor Envelope Company nor AntiDesigns holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N