Comparison Overview

Lee Bird Photography

VS

FOTODOK

Lee Bird Photography

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-12

Get great photos, unlock your business highlight reel, and show dream customers what you’re made of. We all know that head-turning images + a compelling social media feed = a healthy brand and bank balance, right? Much like 8 hours sleep + green smoothies + daily workouts - hot chips with lashings of chicken salt = great physical health. Sure, the formula makes sense, but making it happen at the expense of everything else in your business - and life - can feel downright impossible. (Especially the part about saying no to hot chips.) Until now. It’s time to hit the social media circuit and flex your brand muscle. How, you ask? With awesome photography of course. GIMME A HELL YEAH IF… o You cringe at the sight of your social feeds. o You’re wasting time counting likes, not sales. o You’re tired of *experts* raving about the power of images and social media for business brand - but staying mum on where to find the extra hours in each day to create the content. o You know pro imagery packs a punch but haven’t been able to find the right person for the job o You’re fed up with new brands on the block running circles around your online marketing efforts. o You’re praying your BFF doesn’t realise she left her Prada sunglasses at your place ‘cos damn they are comfy and they look good on you girl! Oh, just me? Presenting… **drum roll please** Lee Biderovsky of Lee Bird Photography. She’s going to take your woes, put them in a bubble, and blow them away. Lee Biderovsky is an expert food, product and branding photographer living the dream in Australia’s culture capital, Melbourne. She’ll whip up a flat lay faster than you can pop the kettle on (N.B. will happily opt for a strawberry daiquiri after 2 pm), and she helps jewellery designers, restaurateurs, homeware retailers, interior and events stylists, and more, bring their business to life.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

FOTODOK

Lange Nieuwstraat 7, Utrecht, 3512 PA, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 700 and 749

FOTODOK intends to demonstrate the importance of visual stories and stands for the potential of photographers and visual artists to drive change. Reflection on urgent social issues is at the heart of FOTODOK’s work. FOTODOK shows different perspectives on the world and provides tools to make informed social choices for the future by learning to look, observe and interpret images.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lee-bird-photography.jpeg
Lee Bird Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fotodok.jpeg
FOTODOK
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lee Bird Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FOTODOK
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lee Bird Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FOTODOK in 2025.

Incident History — Lee Bird Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lee Bird Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FOTODOK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FOTODOK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lee-bird-photography.jpeg
Lee Bird Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fotodok.jpeg
FOTODOK
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lee Bird Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FOTODOK company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, FOTODOK company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lee Bird Photography company.

In the current year, FOTODOK company and Lee Bird Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither FOTODOK company nor Lee Bird Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither FOTODOK company nor Lee Bird Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither FOTODOK company nor Lee Bird Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lee Bird Photography company nor FOTODOK company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lee Bird Photography nor FOTODOK holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lee Bird Photography company nor FOTODOK company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

FOTODOK company employs more people globally than Lee Bird Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Lee Bird Photography nor FOTODOK holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lee Bird Photography nor FOTODOK holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lee Bird Photography nor FOTODOK holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lee Bird Photography nor FOTODOK holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lee Bird Photography nor FOTODOK holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lee Bird Photography nor FOTODOK holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N