Comparison Overview

Lebeda Mattress Factory

VS

Kmart

Lebeda Mattress Factory

undefined, undefined, undefined, 52302, US
Last Update: 2025-05-04 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Lebeda Mattress Factory is the premiere place to buy your new mattress set. Plus you get it straight from the factory, so that way you get the luxurious comfort you deserve without paying exorbitant furniture store prices with their middle man markups! That is the value of factory direct...That is the power of Lebeda Mattress Factory.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kmart

33 W Monroe Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60603, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Life is ridiculously awesome. Thatโ€™s a bold statement. But hey, bold statements are our thing. So hereโ€™s another one: Kmart is ridiculously awesome, too. Know why? Because we work at it. We donโ€™t do anything halfway. We go out and crush it. Weโ€™re about more than the products we sell. And more than creating a great experience in-store and online. Weโ€™re about giving our all, making every day as ridiculously awesome as we believe it can be, and having a great time doing it.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 18,678
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Lebeda Mattress Factory
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kmart.jpeg
Kmart
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Lebeda Mattress Factory
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kmart
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lebeda Mattress Factory in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kmart in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Lebeda Mattress Factory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lebeda Mattress Factory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Kmart (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kmart cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Lebeda Mattress Factory
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kmart.jpeg
Kmart
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malicious Script
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2015
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Lebeda Mattress Factory company and Kmart company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Kmart company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Lebeda Mattress Factory company has not reported any.

In the current year, Kmart company and Lebeda Mattress Factory company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kmart company nor Lebeda Mattress Factory company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kmart company nor Lebeda Mattress Factory company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Kmart company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Lebeda Mattress Factory company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Lebeda Mattress Factory company nor Kmart company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Kmart company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lebeda Mattress Factory company.

Kmart company employs more people globally than Lebeda Mattress Factory company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X