Comparison Overview

Learning by Questions

VS

ITU Online

Learning by Questions

Philips Road, North West, England, BB1 5, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Learning by Questions is a multi award-winning classroom resource that improves education with a pedagogy based on timely feedback, interventions and reduces teacher workload. Students answer questions at their own pace. Wrong answers are always followed by instant feedback. This is constructive in nature and formulated to develop understanding and guide learning. When they answer correctly, students are moved to more challenging questions. Teachers get immediate insight into where they need to intervene, and feedback and intervention happen in the moment when the impact on learning and progress is greatest. Follow our X (@LBQorg) and Facebook (Learning by Questions) platforms for the latest updates.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ITU Online

1960 Bayshore Blvd, Dunedin, FL, 34698, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

ITU Online Training, established in 2012, has been dedicated to bringing students comprehensive training in all major aspects of the IT industry. We offer courses for individuals seeking IT career certifications and corporate training for organizations that want their employees to have the latest technology skills. Our courses are all produced at our in-house studio. The instructors we use must meet our certification standards, plus they must have 10 or more years in their respective field to qualify as an ITU instructor (some courses do require different standards). Each course we offer contains content related to an industry-standard certification and is designed to ensure that students who complete the training, along with supplemental course items, are ready to pass certification exams. We offer courses in IT, project management, cyber security, office software systems, marketing, and much more. Come see what ITU Online has to offer you today! No matter your IT Industry path, we have you covered with training. Follow us on Social: -Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ITUonline -Twitter: @it_university -YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/ITUonlinetraining -Instagram: @itu_online

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/learning-by-questions.jpeg
Learning by Questions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ituonline.jpeg
ITU Online
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Learning by Questions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ITU Online
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Learning by Questions in 2025.

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ITU Online in 2025.

Incident History — Learning by Questions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Learning by Questions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ITU Online (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ITU Online cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/learning-by-questions.jpeg
Learning by Questions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ituonline.jpeg
ITU Online
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Learning by Questions company and ITU Online company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, ITU Online company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Learning by Questions company.

In the current year, ITU Online company and Learning by Questions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ITU Online company nor Learning by Questions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ITU Online company nor Learning by Questions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ITU Online company nor Learning by Questions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Learning by Questions company nor ITU Online company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Learning by Questions nor ITU Online holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Learning by Questions company nor ITU Online company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ITU Online company employs more people globally than Learning by Questions company, reflecting its scale as a E-learning.

Neither Learning by Questions nor ITU Online holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Learning by Questions nor ITU Online holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Learning by Questions nor ITU Online holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Learning by Questions nor ITU Online holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Learning by Questions nor ITU Online holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Learning by Questions nor ITU Online holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in xerrors Yuxi-Know up to 0.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function OtherEmbedding.aencode of the file /src/models/embed.py. Performing manipulation of the argument health_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named 0ff771dc1933d5a6b78f804115e78a7d8625c3f3. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor responded with a vulnerability confirmation and a list of security measures they have established already (e.g. disabled URL parsing, disabled URL upload mode, removed URL-to-markdown conversion).

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Rarlab RAR App up to 7.11 Build 127 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component com.rarlab.rar. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.20 build 128 is able to mitigate this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor responded very professional: "This is the real vulnerability affecting RAR for Android only. WinRAR and Unix RAR versions are not affected. We already fixed it in RAR for Android 7.20 build 128 and we publicly mentioned it in that version changelog. (...) To avoid confusion among users, it would be useful if such disclosure emphasizes that it is RAR for Android only issue and WinRAR isn't affected."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected by this issue is the function zfilev2_api.OpenSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/open of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument safe_dir causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X