Comparison Overview

Learn to Live, Inc.

VS

WestCoast Children's Clinic

Learn to Live, Inc.

30 S 9th Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55402, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

Learn to Live’s confidential, self-directed programs use evidence-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) supported by 24/7 clinician coaching to address common mental health problems and remove stigma, access, and cost barriers. Our programs give people convenient, confidential, and easy access to tools to help them improve and manage their mental health. We are providing a better solution for employers, health plans, health systems, and higher education institutions who want to expand access to affordable, best-in-class benefits. Learn to Live programs include social anxiety; depression; stress, anxiety and worry; insomnia; substance use; panic; resilience. Our programs are complemented by: - Comprehensive psychometric assessments that suggest personalized growth opportunities. - Several monthly live webinars with information about timely topics. - Weekly encouraging “mindfulness moments” text messages that remind users to pause and take a mental health break. - Live clinician coaching to support progress through each program. - The ability to invite a friend or family member to support a person’s mental health journey. Visit learntolive.com for more information.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

WestCoast Children's Clinic

3301 E 12th St, None, Oakland, CA, US, 94601
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 700 and 749

WestCoast Children’s Clinic is a private non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of vulnerable children, youth and families through a variety of psychological services, including outpatient therapy, psychological assessments and foster youth development. In an effort to ensure continuous availability of these services, WCC offers training and educational programs designed to support the next generation of mental health professionals.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 198
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/learn-to-live-llc.jpeg
Learn to Live, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/westcoastcc.jpeg
WestCoast Children's Clinic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Learn to Live, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
WestCoast Children's Clinic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Learn to Live, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WestCoast Children's Clinic in 2026.

Incident History — Learn to Live, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Learn to Live, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — WestCoast Children's Clinic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WestCoast Children's Clinic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/learn-to-live-llc.jpeg
Learn to Live, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/westcoastcc.jpeg
WestCoast Children's Clinic
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2013
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2012
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Learn to Live, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to WestCoast Children's Clinic company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

WestCoast Children's Clinic company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Learn to Live, Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, WestCoast Children's Clinic company and Learn to Live, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither WestCoast Children's Clinic company nor Learn to Live, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

WestCoast Children's Clinic company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Learn to Live, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither WestCoast Children's Clinic company nor Learn to Live, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Learn to Live, Inc. company nor WestCoast Children's Clinic company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Learn to Live, Inc. nor WestCoast Children's Clinic holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Learn to Live, Inc. company nor WestCoast Children's Clinic company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

WestCoast Children's Clinic company employs more people globally than Learn to Live, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Learn to Live, Inc. nor WestCoast Children's Clinic holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Learn to Live, Inc. nor WestCoast Children's Clinic holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Learn to Live, Inc. nor WestCoast Children's Clinic holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Learn to Live, Inc. nor WestCoast Children's Clinic holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Learn to Live, Inc. nor WestCoast Children's Clinic holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Learn to Live, Inc. nor WestCoast Children's Clinic holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N