Comparison Overview

Lear Corporation

VS

JLR

Lear Corporation

21557 Telegraph Rd, Southfield , Michigan, 48033, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Lear, a global automotive technology leader in Seating and E-Systems, enables superior in-vehicle experiences for consumers around the world. Our diverse team of talented employees in 37 countries is driven by a commitment to innovation, operational excellence, and sustainability. Lear is Making every drive better™ by providing the technology for safer, smarter, and more comfortable journeys. Further information is available at lear.com

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 47,129
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

JLR

Abbey Road, Whitley, Coventry, West Midlands, GB, CV3 4LF
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 0 and 549

Every vehicle. Every innovation. Every bit of momentum in over 170 markets worldwide. None of it would be possible without the expertise, drive and continued ambition of our people. We’re proud of our heritage, but it’s our vision for the future that excites us most. Right across our business, everybody plays a crucial role in the ever-evolving JLR journey. And with exciting new products, cutting-edge facilities and continued growth into new markets, there has never been a more exciting time to join us. We may be renowned for our iconic vehicles, but our drive for excellence covers more than premium design and world-class engineering. Ours is a truly global business, with the opportunities to match. You can learn more about our business areas and current opportunities here on the JLR Linked Company pages. This is also the place to ask any questions you may have, share your experiences and talk to the other talented individuals who are thinking about joining us. We look forward to talking with you.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 41,687
Subsidiaries: 58
12-month incidents
6
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lear-corporation.jpeg
Lear Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jaguar-land-rover_1.jpeg
JLR
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lear Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
JLR
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lear Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

JLR has 782.35% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Lear Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lear Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — JLR (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JLR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lear-corporation.jpeg
Lear Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jaguar-land-rover_1.jpeg
JLR
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial Gain, Disruption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing Emails, Spoofed Supplier Communications, WhatsApp Scams, Human Error (Misplaced Trust)
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Reputational Damage, Exploitation of Human Behavior
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Lear Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to JLR company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

JLR company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Lear Corporation company has not reported any.

In the current year, JLR company has reported more cyber incidents than Lear Corporation company.

JLR company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Lear Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

JLR company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Lear Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

JLR company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Lear Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Lear Corporation company nor JLR company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lear Corporation nor JLR holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

JLR company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lear Corporation company.

Lear Corporation company employs more people globally than JLR company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Lear Corporation nor JLR holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lear Corporation nor JLR holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lear Corporation nor JLR holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lear Corporation nor JLR holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lear Corporation nor JLR holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lear Corporation nor JLR holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N