Comparison Overview

Leapin' Lizard Labels

VS

Metro Print and Mail Solutions

Leapin' Lizard Labels

2649 E. Mulberry, Fort Collins, CO, 80524, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.leapinlizardlabels.com

Leapin’ Lizard Labels is a label printing company that makes your brand “stick”. We’re fun to work with, understand your needs as an entrepreneur, focus on fast turnarounds, and are as green as we possibly can be (after all, that’s our natural color- we’re lizards!) We have customers around the country, and ship anywhere. We take a consultative approach, helping bring your brand to life through quick-turn, long-lasting, vivid stickers or labels. Our printers are on line round the clock and we don’t outsource to a “print farm”. We approach the printing of your labels and stickers as craftsmen, and if your job requires some inventiveness and an uncommon approach, we’ll work to make your label distinctive so it will help you drive sales.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Metro Print and Mail Solutions

4251 Gateway Park Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95834, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mmsmail.com

METRO provides comprehensive data processing, printing, fulfillment, and direct mail services. All services are on site, ensuring the highest levels of efficiency, quality control and cost effectiveness. We work with our clients to meet their individual challenges because each client and project is unique. METRO is committed to providing our clients with all the benefits of cutting edge technology without sacrificing personal service.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leapin'-lizard-labels.jpeg
Leapin' Lizard Labels
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metro-print-and-mail-solutions.jpeg
Metro Print and Mail Solutions
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Leapin' Lizard Labels
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Metro Print and Mail Solutions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Leapin' Lizard Labels in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metro Print and Mail Solutions in 2025.

Incident History — Leapin' Lizard Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Leapin' Lizard Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Metro Print and Mail Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metro Print and Mail Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leapin'-lizard-labels.jpeg
Leapin' Lizard Labels
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metro-print-and-mail-solutions.jpeg
Metro Print and Mail Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Metro Print and Mail Solutions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Leapin' Lizard Labels company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Metro Print and Mail Solutions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Leapin' Lizard Labels company.

In the current year, Metro Print and Mail Solutions company and Leapin' Lizard Labels company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Metro Print and Mail Solutions company nor Leapin' Lizard Labels company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Metro Print and Mail Solutions company nor Leapin' Lizard Labels company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Metro Print and Mail Solutions company nor Leapin' Lizard Labels company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Leapin' Lizard Labels company nor Metro Print and Mail Solutions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Leapin' Lizard Labels nor Metro Print and Mail Solutions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Leapin' Lizard Labels company nor Metro Print and Mail Solutions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Metro Print and Mail Solutions company employs more people globally than Leapin' Lizard Labels company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Leapin' Lizard Labels nor Metro Print and Mail Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Leapin' Lizard Labels nor Metro Print and Mail Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Leapin' Lizard Labels nor Metro Print and Mail Solutions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Leapin' Lizard Labels nor Metro Print and Mail Solutions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Leapin' Lizard Labels nor Metro Print and Mail Solutions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Leapin' Lizard Labels nor Metro Print and Mail Solutions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References