Comparison Overview

Leapin' Lizard Labels

VS

Coral Graphics Services

Leapin' Lizard Labels

2649 E. Mulberry, Fort Collins, CO, 80524, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.leapinlizardlabels.com

Leapin’ Lizard Labels is a label printing company that makes your brand “stick”. We’re fun to work with, understand your needs as an entrepreneur, focus on fast turnarounds, and are as green as we possibly can be (after all, that’s our natural color- we’re lizards!) We have customers around the country, and ship anywhere. We take a consultative approach, helping bring your brand to life through quick-turn, long-lasting, vivid stickers or labels. Our printers are on line round the clock and we don’t outsource to a “print farm”. We approach the printing of your labels and stickers as craftsmen, and if your job requires some inventiveness and an uncommon approach, we’ll work to make your label distinctive so it will help you drive sales.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Coral Graphics Services

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.beprintersamerica.com

BE Printers America, a division of Bertelsmann Media, operates as Coral Graphics, Berryville Graphics, Offset Paperback Manufacturers, and Dynamic Graphics. Combined these companies are leading producers of digitally and conventionally printed books, book components, multimedia packaging and commercial print. The expected requirements of a modern print production business are simple: deliver high-quality results quickly and flexibly. Ideally, production capabilities are rounded off with comprehensive customer care and consulting services. To meet these expectations, BE Printers'​ print services providers use state-of-the-art technology and offer solution packages that go far beyond the pure printing process. BE Printers'​ print business focuses on the individual needs and requirements of its customers – whether they are publishers or shipping firms, requiring large editions or small print runs. Our portfolio of services covers countless solutions across the entire print production value chain, from comprehensive design and pre-press services to complex personalization options to finishing and custom-tailored packaging services, and even distribution.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leapin'-lizard-labels.jpeg
Leapin' Lizard Labels
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arvato-print.jpeg
Coral Graphics Services
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Leapin' Lizard Labels
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Coral Graphics Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Leapin' Lizard Labels in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coral Graphics Services in 2025.

Incident History — Leapin' Lizard Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Leapin' Lizard Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Coral Graphics Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coral Graphics Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leapin'-lizard-labels.jpeg
Leapin' Lizard Labels
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arvato-print.jpeg
Coral Graphics Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Coral Graphics Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Leapin' Lizard Labels company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Coral Graphics Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Leapin' Lizard Labels company.

In the current year, Coral Graphics Services company and Leapin' Lizard Labels company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Coral Graphics Services company nor Leapin' Lizard Labels company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Coral Graphics Services company nor Leapin' Lizard Labels company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Coral Graphics Services company nor Leapin' Lizard Labels company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Leapin' Lizard Labels company nor Coral Graphics Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Leapin' Lizard Labels nor Coral Graphics Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Leapin' Lizard Labels company nor Coral Graphics Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Coral Graphics Services company employs more people globally than Leapin' Lizard Labels company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Leapin' Lizard Labels nor Coral Graphics Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Leapin' Lizard Labels nor Coral Graphics Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Leapin' Lizard Labels nor Coral Graphics Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Leapin' Lizard Labels nor Coral Graphics Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Leapin' Lizard Labels nor Coral Graphics Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Leapin' Lizard Labels nor Coral Graphics Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References