Comparison Overview

Leal Advocacia

VS

Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke

Leal Advocacia

Rua Floriano Peixoto, 654 Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo 14010-200, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-27

O escritório Leal Advocacia é conceituado por oferecer qualidade de serviços e atendimento a todas as necessidades jurídicas, apresentando as mais adequadas e criativas respostas. Com sua política de atendimento individualizado e diferenciado, consegue maximizar as oportunidades de cada projeto e atender prontamente às expectativas e necessidades de seus clientes.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke

90292, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Over seventeen years, Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke, LLP has evolved from an individual law practice to a full-service law firm. However, we never lost sight of the philosophy that was instituted when our doors first opened — that we would always be accessible to our clients; that we would involve our clients in the decisions that affected them rather than making decisions for them; and that we would become more than law practitioners, we would look at the bigger picture and become problem solvers.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leal-advocacia.jpeg
Leal Advocacia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Leal Advocacia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Leal Advocacia in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke in 2025.

Incident History — Leal Advocacia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Leal Advocacia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leal-advocacia.jpeg
Leal Advocacia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Leal Advocacia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Leal Advocacia company.

In the current year, Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke company and Leal Advocacia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke company nor Leal Advocacia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke company nor Leal Advocacia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke company nor Leal Advocacia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Leal Advocacia company nor Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Leal Advocacia nor Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Leal Advocacia company nor Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke company employs more people globally than Leal Advocacia company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Leal Advocacia nor Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Leal Advocacia nor Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Leal Advocacia nor Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Leal Advocacia nor Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Leal Advocacia nor Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Leal Advocacia nor Voss, Silverman & Braybrooke holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X