Comparison Overview

Leaderpress

VS

Starpak Corp.

Leaderpress

14 Donovan St, Osborne Park, Western Australia, 6017, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Leaderpress was established over 25 years ago and has become an industry leader in supplying printed material direct to clients and trade suppliers to government departments, graphic designers and even other printers. Over the years, we have built strong relationships with suppliers who assist us with specialist items that requires outsourcing. These providers are efficient and we experience prompt and premium services from them. The majority of our staff are long-term employees who have grown with the company and have great pride in Leaderpress, which is reflected in their work. Print management systems can be arranged on an annual basis or smaller time frame to suit each client. Advanced planning reduces production costs, making it possible to pass substantial savings onto the client. By programming work well in advance, we can minimise turnaround time, in some cases to, simply the time it takes to organise dispatch of the goods. Contact us today for assistance with all your printing and binding requirements. Our experienced team is on hand to assist you.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Starpak Corp.

9690 W. Wingfoot Rd., Houston, TX, US, 77041
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

StarPak is a fully-integrated, premier printer and leading global supplier of high-quality flexible packaging products. Through the use of the latest technologies, our highly experienced and innovative team at StarPak is dedicated to producing high performance products with the lowest possible carbon footprint. We set the standards in the flexible plastic industry with our solid reputation as a customer-driven organization and commitment to innovation and sustainability.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 182
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leaderpress-perthprinting.jpeg
Leaderpress
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/starpak-ltd.jpeg
Starpak Corp.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Leaderpress
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Starpak Corp.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Leaderpress in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Starpak Corp. in 2025.

Incident History — Leaderpress (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Leaderpress cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Starpak Corp. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Starpak Corp. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leaderpress-perthprinting.jpeg
Leaderpress
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/starpak-ltd.jpeg
Starpak Corp.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Leaderpress company and Starpak Corp. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Starpak Corp. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Leaderpress company.

In the current year, Starpak Corp. company and Leaderpress company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Starpak Corp. company nor Leaderpress company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Starpak Corp. company nor Leaderpress company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Starpak Corp. company nor Leaderpress company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Leaderpress company nor Starpak Corp. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Leaderpress nor Starpak Corp. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Leaderpress company nor Starpak Corp. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Starpak Corp. company employs more people globally than Leaderpress company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Leaderpress nor Starpak Corp. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Leaderpress nor Starpak Corp. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Leaderpress nor Starpak Corp. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Leaderpress nor Starpak Corp. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Leaderpress nor Starpak Corp. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Leaderpress nor Starpak Corp. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N