Comparison Overview

Leaderpress

VS

GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services

Leaderpress

14 Donovan St, Osborne Park, Western Australia, 6017, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Leaderpress was established over 25 years ago and has become an industry leader in supplying printed material direct to clients and trade suppliers to government departments, graphic designers and even other printers. Over the years, we have built strong relationships with suppliers who assist us with specialist items that requires outsourcing. These providers are efficient and we experience prompt and premium services from them. The majority of our staff are long-term employees who have grown with the company and have great pride in Leaderpress, which is reflected in their work. Print management systems can be arranged on an annual basis or smaller time frame to suit each client. Advanced planning reduces production costs, making it possible to pass substantial savings onto the client. By programming work well in advance, we can minimise turnaround time, in some cases to, simply the time it takes to organise dispatch of the goods. Contact us today for assistance with all your printing and binding requirements. Our experienced team is on hand to assist you.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services

24 Karl-Marx-Straße, Pößneck, undefined, 07381, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Wir, die GGP Media GmbH, sind eines der führenden Unternehmen für den Bereich Druck am europäischen Markt. Als Teil der Bertelsmann Marketing Services (BMS) sind wir ein starker Partner für die Realisierung unterschiedlichster Projekte – egal ob Buch, E-Book, Zeitschrift, Katalog, A5-Publikationen oder Akzidenzen. Mit unserem langjährigen Know-how, hoch qualifizierten Mitarbeitern und einem umfassenden Maschinenpark ist jede Idee bei uns in den besten Händen. An unserem Standort in Pößneck werden täglich über vier Millionen Druckbogen verarbeitet – immer mit der Prämisse, höchste Qualität und das beste Endprodukt zu erzielen. Wir bieten unseren Kunden aus den unterschiedlichsten Branchen crossmediale Full-Service-Lösungen und eine individuelle Beratung nach ihren Wünschen und Bedürfnissen. Dabei steht die Wirtschaftlichkeit für uns genauso im Fokus wie die gesellschaftliche Verantwortung und ein ökologisches Handeln.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leaderpress-perthprinting.jpeg
Leaderpress
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ggp-media-gmbh.jpeg
GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Leaderpress
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Leaderpress in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services in 2025.

Incident History — Leaderpress (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Leaderpress cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leaderpress-perthprinting.jpeg
Leaderpress
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ggp-media-gmbh.jpeg
GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Leaderpress company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Leaderpress company.

In the current year, GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services company and Leaderpress company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services company nor Leaderpress company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services company nor Leaderpress company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services company nor Leaderpress company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Leaderpress company nor GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Leaderpress nor GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Leaderpress company.

GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services company employs more people globally than Leaderpress company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Leaderpress nor GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Leaderpress nor GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Leaderpress nor GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Leaderpress nor GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Leaderpress nor GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Leaderpress nor GGP Media GmbH - part of Bertelsmann Marketing Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L