Comparison Overview

Leaderform S.p.A.

VS

XL Digital Imaging

Leaderform S.p.A.

Via Molina 14, Sona, 37060, IT
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.leaderform.com/

LEADERFORM: DIRECT MARKETING AND BUSINESS COMMUNICATION SERVICES ISO 9001 - ISO/IEC 27001 - ISO 14001 - FSC Member of CPX Group Leaderform is a modern and reliable company, with a strong presence on the Italian and European area which operates in the Direct Marketing and Business Communication. The offices in Verona, Rome and Milan assure the answering competence that only the big organizations have, guarantying flexibility and efficiency. For Leaderform every customer is unique. To give efficacy to the communication strategies, the company commits itself to diversify the commercial offer day by day, because it can rely on a qualified and dynamic organization and can interpret with attention and professionalism every single demand from the market. PRINTING SOLUTIONS. Offset and Digital Printing Technologies Laser/Inkjet personalization Outsourcing Management (banking, insurance, utilities) Document Management Optical Storage and Electronic Storage Delivery Multichannel Production of complete mail shots Self-mailers /Self-enveloping forms Scratch off-Piggy Back -Glue -Hole punching-Windows -Die cutting VERONA - HEAD OFFICE: Via Molina,14 - 37060 Sona (VR) - [email protected] Tel +39 045 6080822 - Fax +39 045 6080815

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

XL Digital Imaging

11625 Columbia Center Drive, Ste. 200, Dallas, TX, 75229, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://xldigital.com

We're XL Digital - the printing company you can trust to get your big job done right. If you can imagine it, we can make it happen! We specialize in creating large and grand format displays. Whether you need trade show displays, wallscapes, indoor/outdoor signage, custom signage, vehicle wraps, billboard vinyls, or something else entirely, we can bring your ideas to life.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leaderform.jpeg
Leaderform S.p.A.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xl-digital-imaging-llc.jpeg
XL Digital Imaging
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Leaderform S.p.A.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
XL Digital Imaging
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Leaderform S.p.A. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for XL Digital Imaging in 2025.

Incident History — Leaderform S.p.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Leaderform S.p.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — XL Digital Imaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

XL Digital Imaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leaderform.jpeg
Leaderform S.p.A.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xl-digital-imaging-llc.jpeg
XL Digital Imaging
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Leaderform S.p.A. company and XL Digital Imaging company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, XL Digital Imaging company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Leaderform S.p.A. company.

In the current year, XL Digital Imaging company and Leaderform S.p.A. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither XL Digital Imaging company nor Leaderform S.p.A. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither XL Digital Imaging company nor Leaderform S.p.A. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither XL Digital Imaging company nor Leaderform S.p.A. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Leaderform S.p.A. company nor XL Digital Imaging company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Leaderform S.p.A. nor XL Digital Imaging holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Leaderform S.p.A. company nor XL Digital Imaging company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Leaderform S.p.A. company employs more people globally than XL Digital Imaging company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Leaderform S.p.A. nor XL Digital Imaging holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Leaderform S.p.A. nor XL Digital Imaging holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Leaderform S.p.A. nor XL Digital Imaging holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Leaderform S.p.A. nor XL Digital Imaging holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Leaderform S.p.A. nor XL Digital Imaging holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Leaderform S.p.A. nor XL Digital Imaging holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References