Comparison Overview

LCM Relo Solutions

VS

MDK

LCM Relo Solutions

1500 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19102, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

LCM Relo Solutions (LCM) is an attorney driven closing services provider that offers the only single-point-of-contact destination closing management solution in the relocation industry. LCM partners with employers to provide high-touch services to their relocating employees throughout the United States. Our guidance provides the employee with the confidence that their transaction is being managed properly, allowing the employee to focus on the details of a new job and community. Our relocation counselors and attorneys combine a national scope with local expertise to assist in every aspect of a relocation home purchase.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MDK

P.O. Box 165028, Columbus, Ohio, 43216, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

MDK is a comprehensive legal and professional services provider. We are simplifiers and problem solvers, leaning into creativity to solve problems in ways that generate true value. Legal experience is our standard; we multiply its value by offering business services and proprietary technologies that make your processes more efficient and our solutions more successful. In that way, we are both a legal and a business partner. In every engagement, we explore the drivers of our clients’ success, then seek to remove the mundane legal tasks that interfere with your true business goals. With MDK, you’re working with a firm that serves clients better than expected and beyond the ordinary.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 296
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lcm-relo-solutions.jpeg
LCM Relo Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/manley-deas-kochalski-llc.jpeg
MDK
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LCM Relo Solutions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MDK
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LCM Relo Solutions in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MDK in 2025.

Incident History — LCM Relo Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LCM Relo Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MDK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MDK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lcm-relo-solutions.jpeg
LCM Relo Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/manley-deas-kochalski-llc.jpeg
MDK
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MDK company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LCM Relo Solutions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MDK company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LCM Relo Solutions company.

In the current year, MDK company and LCM Relo Solutions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MDK company nor LCM Relo Solutions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MDK company nor LCM Relo Solutions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MDK company nor LCM Relo Solutions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LCM Relo Solutions company nor MDK company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LCM Relo Solutions nor MDK holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither LCM Relo Solutions company nor MDK company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MDK company employs more people globally than LCM Relo Solutions company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither LCM Relo Solutions nor MDK holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LCM Relo Solutions nor MDK holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LCM Relo Solutions nor MDK holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LCM Relo Solutions nor MDK holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LCM Relo Solutions nor MDK holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LCM Relo Solutions nor MDK holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X