Comparison Overview

Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation

VS

Pathways Autism Center

Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation

undefined, Adelaide, undefined, undefined, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

We are capacity builders and leading experts in translating the science of wellbeing, trauma and growth into action, and moving this science from just another thing to do, to a way of thinking and being. Our work delivers sustainable ripple effects that expands from people, to organisations, to communities and into systems, and deliver outcomes important to all layers. We partner with people, teams, schools, programs, agencies and communities to strengthen the delivery of outcomes important to them. Our suite of scientifically grounded capacity building services include: - IMPACT training, coaching and accreditation. - Whole-of-school, program and community capacity building initiatives. - IMPACT Coach community network. - Research, consultancy and thought leadership. - Advocacy.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pathways Autism Center

6849 Peachtree Dunwoody Road, Atlanta, 30328, US
Last Update: 2025-12-20

Pathways is proud to serve the state of Georgia as a premier provider of applied behavior analysis therapy services. Our team of highly educated and trained behavior analysts and technicians are dedicated to providing quality services to enhance the education and lives of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We work with individuals from early childhood to adult in home, school, and community settings. We strive to create a collaborative environment which includes our experts and your family. By working together, we can create instructional and behavioral plans that are tailored to each individuals unique needs maximizing growth in communication, development, and independence.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lbi-foundation.jpeg
Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pathways-behavioral-consulting-llc..jpeg
Pathways Autism Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pathways Autism Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pathways Autism Center in 2026.

Incident History — Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pathways Autism Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pathways Autism Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lbi-foundation.jpeg
Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pathways-behavioral-consulting-llc..jpeg
Pathways Autism Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pathways Autism Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pathways Autism Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation company.

In the current year, Pathways Autism Center company and Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pathways Autism Center company nor Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pathways Autism Center company nor Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pathways Autism Center company nor Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation company nor Pathways Autism Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation nor Pathways Autism Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation company nor Pathways Autism Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pathways Autism Center company employs more people globally than Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation nor Pathways Autism Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation nor Pathways Autism Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation nor Pathways Autism Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation nor Pathways Autism Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation nor Pathways Autism Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Life Buoyancy Institute Foundation nor Pathways Autism Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N