Comparison Overview

Layman Publishing Group

VS

ECHO Review Literary Magazine

Layman Publishing Group

2006 Sumter Street, Columbia, South Carolina, US, 29201
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Layman Poupard Publishing (LPP) is a full-service production team, developing literary projects from inception to ready-to-publish form in both print and electronic media. We pride ourselves on professionalism, editorial excellence, and punctual delivery of enduring reference works that serve the needs of students, academics, and independent users. LPP employs a team of professionals, who generate text, edit, typeset, code, proofread, coordinate makeup, and procure necessary reprint licenses. We produce the Literature Criticism Series for Gale/Cengage Learning, 111 volumes per year comprising some 25 million words.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ECHO Review Literary Magazine

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28

ECHO REVIEW is a literary magazine devoted to history. Founded in 2023, we welcome all literature that nods to the past in some way. We aren't picky about what your words may be dedicated to, be it a past relative or the Napoleonic Wars. We simply want words that look over their shoulders at the past, and at the path that has been carved along the way.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/layman-publishing-llc.jpeg
Layman Publishing Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/echo-review-literary-magazine.jpeg
ECHO Review Literary Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Layman Publishing Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ECHO Review Literary Magazine
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Layman Publishing Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ECHO Review Literary Magazine in 2025.

Incident History — Layman Publishing Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Layman Publishing Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ECHO Review Literary Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ECHO Review Literary Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/layman-publishing-llc.jpeg
Layman Publishing Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/echo-review-literary-magazine.jpeg
ECHO Review Literary Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Layman Publishing Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ECHO Review Literary Magazine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ECHO Review Literary Magazine company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Layman Publishing Group company.

In the current year, ECHO Review Literary Magazine company and Layman Publishing Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ECHO Review Literary Magazine company nor Layman Publishing Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ECHO Review Literary Magazine company nor Layman Publishing Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ECHO Review Literary Magazine company nor Layman Publishing Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Layman Publishing Group company nor ECHO Review Literary Magazine company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Layman Publishing Group nor ECHO Review Literary Magazine holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Layman Publishing Group company nor ECHO Review Literary Magazine company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Layman Publishing Group company employs more people globally than ECHO Review Literary Magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Layman Publishing Group nor ECHO Review Literary Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Layman Publishing Group nor ECHO Review Literary Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Layman Publishing Group nor ECHO Review Literary Magazine holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Layman Publishing Group nor ECHO Review Literary Magazine holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Layman Publishing Group nor ECHO Review Literary Magazine holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Layman Publishing Group nor ECHO Review Literary Magazine holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.