Comparison Overview

Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area

VS

KHQ Lawyers

Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area

131 Steuart Street, San Francisco, 94105, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area, founded in 1968, works to advance, protect and promote the legal rights of communities of color, and low-income persons, immigrants, and refugees. Assisted by hundreds of pro bono attorneys, LCCR provides free legal assistance and representation to individuals on civil legal matters through direct services, impact litigation and policy advocacy. OUR HISTORY Lawyers'​ Committee, affiliated with the national Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, which was founded in 1963 at the request of President John F. Kennedy. Following the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. in 1968, leading members of the San Francisco Bar established the San Francisco Bay Area office to advance civil rights. Towards this end, Lawyers'​ Committee staff--with the assistance of hundreds of pro bono attorneys--provides free legal assistance and representation to individuals on civil legal matters. In addition, the Lawyers'​ Committee handles policy impact cases that focus on important civil rights issues.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

KHQ Lawyers

Level 4, 600 Bourke St, Melbourne, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

KHQ Lawyers was founded in March 2006 by two lawyers from top-tier and in-house backgrounds who had a vision for a new type of law firm – ‘boutique top-tier’, a firm with top-tier talent, clients, and expertise underpinned by the best characteristics of a boutique firm (namely, nimble, efficient, friendly, and cost effective). While relatively young in approach and outlook, we have built a solid reputation as a strong team of talented practitioners from top-tier and in-house environments. We are proud to be the firm of choice for a prestigious list of ASX-listed and multinational clients across Australia. Our diverse client base also includes high net worth individuals, SMEs, and niche agencies and consultancies. Our teams are led by highly respected practitioners, many of whom have been recognised as among the best in their fields. We focus on getting to know our clients, and tailoring our delivery to their needs. We work closely with our clients to ensure that our services and solutions are relevant to their commercial objectives and are in their best interests. Our expertise includes: - Commercial Property & Development - Competition Law & Regulatory Compliance - Construction & Infrastructure - Corporate & Commercial - Data Privacy, Cyber & Digital - Litigation & Dispute Resolution - Family & Relationship Law - Food & Beverage - Insolvency & Restructuring - Intellectual Property - Private Wealth - Superannuation & Financial Services - Tax & Structuring - Technology - Wills & Estates, and - Workplace Relations & Safety. Our passion and dedication to high quality service delivery is at the core of everything we do.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 115
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lawyers-committee-for-civil-rights-of-the-san-francisco-bay-area.jpeg
Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/khq-lawyers.jpeg
KHQ Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KHQ Lawyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KHQ Lawyers in 2025.

Incident History — Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KHQ Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KHQ Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lawyers-committee-for-civil-rights-of-the-san-francisco-bay-area.jpeg
Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/khq-lawyers.jpeg
KHQ Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

KHQ Lawyers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, KHQ Lawyers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area company.

In the current year, KHQ Lawyers company and Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither KHQ Lawyers company nor Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither KHQ Lawyers company nor Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KHQ Lawyers company nor Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area company nor KHQ Lawyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area nor KHQ Lawyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

KHQ Lawyers company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area company.

KHQ Lawyers company employs more people globally than Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area nor KHQ Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area nor KHQ Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area nor KHQ Lawyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area nor KHQ Lawyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area nor KHQ Lawyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lawyers'​ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area nor KHQ Lawyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X