Comparison Overview

Law Center for Better Housing

VS

Hum Law Firm Employment Law

Law Center for Better Housing

33 N. LaSalle, Suite 900, Chicago, IL, 60602, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Law Center for Better Housing (LCBH) is recognized as a leading public interest law firm specializing in housing law and policy. Founded in 1980 by a small group of lawyers concerned about deteriorating apartment buildings and housing abandonment in the Rogers Park neighborhood, LCBH now serves all of Chicago. Today, LCBH has five legal programs and supportive services providing a holistic approach to its clients through meaningful access to the judicial process and linkages to essential services that can help avoid homelessness. LCBH focuses on tenants in the private rental market facing critical housing issues with this target group representing more than 70% of Chicago’s low-income households. LCBH is the only agency in the Chicago area to focus its legal services exclusively on renters. In 2011, the agency provided direct services to 1,932 tenant families and total services and education impacting well over 7,000 individuals. In recent years the agency’s expertise in landlord/tenant issues has uniquely positioned it to be at the forefront of the foreclosure crisis as it affects tenants and to assist community-based organizations and agencies in Chicago as well as Cook County and other areas of Illinois in educating stakeholders on foreclosure issues.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hum Law Firm Employment Law

First Canadian Place, 100 King St. West, Toronto, Ontario, M5X 1C7, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Our Philosophy: Setting us apart We believe employment law is the expression of our shared values of prosperity, respect and equal opportunity. The goal is to support productive workplaces that drive economic growth, and where safety, security and the dignity of the individual are protected. At Hum Law, we consider the whole picture. We understand the complex interconnections that support a healthy workplace culture. We know employment law in all its forms and from every angle. With extensive experience, we balance the risks with the rewards to develop a clear and practical approach that advances client objectives. We use active listening to develop strategies for success. As our client, you are consulted at every stage, ensuring a growing level of confidence as the matter develops and is resolved. Organizations doing business across Canada need legal counsel experienced in two legal systems. Clients rely on our expertise in practicing civil and common law in both official languages in Quebec and the rest of Canada. Strategically aggressive legal tactics have their place. However, optimal outcomes are not necessarily the result of uncompromising negotiations or courtroom confrontations. We offer a pragmatic and determined approach, measuring our success by our clients’ satisfaction. We employ strong negotiating skills and draw on extensive expertise to achieve the best possible outcome from the client’s perspective, usually resolving issues outside of the courtroom. But make no mistake, when going to court is the only means to resolution, we fight to win. Reaching out for diversity, inclusion and equity in the community

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lawyers'-committee-for-better-housing.jpeg
Law Center for Better Housing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-hum-law-firm.jpeg
Hum Law Firm Employment Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Law Center for Better Housing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hum Law Firm Employment Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Law Center for Better Housing in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hum Law Firm Employment Law in 2025.

Incident History — Law Center for Better Housing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Law Center for Better Housing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hum Law Firm Employment Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hum Law Firm Employment Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lawyers'-committee-for-better-housing.jpeg
Law Center for Better Housing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-hum-law-firm.jpeg
Hum Law Firm Employment Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Law Center for Better Housing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hum Law Firm Employment Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hum Law Firm Employment Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Law Center for Better Housing company.

In the current year, Hum Law Firm Employment Law company and Law Center for Better Housing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hum Law Firm Employment Law company nor Law Center for Better Housing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hum Law Firm Employment Law company nor Law Center for Better Housing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hum Law Firm Employment Law company nor Law Center for Better Housing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Law Center for Better Housing company nor Hum Law Firm Employment Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Law Center for Better Housing nor Hum Law Firm Employment Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Law Center for Better Housing company nor Hum Law Firm Employment Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Law Center for Better Housing company employs more people globally than Hum Law Firm Employment Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Law Center for Better Housing nor Hum Law Firm Employment Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Law Center for Better Housing nor Hum Law Firm Employment Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Law Center for Better Housing nor Hum Law Firm Employment Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Law Center for Better Housing nor Hum Law Firm Employment Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Law Center for Better Housing nor Hum Law Firm Employment Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Law Center for Better Housing nor Hum Law Firm Employment Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X