Comparison Overview

Lawson + Lawson LLP

VS

Connolly Suthers Lawyers

Lawson + Lawson LLP

One Sansome Street, San Francisco, 94104, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lawson2.com

Founded in 2010 by former Paul Hastings attorneys Beth Pennington and Lisa Lawson, Lawson + Lawson (formerly Pennington Lawson LLP) is a women-owned boutique law firm in San Francisco. The partners in our firm have over 50 years of experience representing companies in complex employment litigation and commercial litigation matters. The firm's specialties include: Employment Litigation Commercial Litigation Employment Law Counseling Workplace Investigations Workplace Training Employment Policies & Agreements

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Connolly Suthers Lawyers

AMP Building, 416 Flinders Street, Townsville City, QLD, 4810, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.connollysuthers.com.au

Connolly Suthers Lawyers is glad to be celebrating 125 years in practicing Law. We are a multi-disciplinary practice which serves our district, here, in North Queensland well. By combining extensively trained and experienced legal practitioners with state-of-the-art communications and technology, Connolly Suthers delivers a level of legal service that is unrivalled in the region. Read on below, navigate to our new website, or just simply call us now on (07) 4771 5664.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lawson2.jpeg
Lawson + Lawson LLP
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/connolly-suthers-lawyers.jpeg
Connolly Suthers Lawyers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lawson + Lawson LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Connolly Suthers Lawyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lawson + Lawson LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Connolly Suthers Lawyers in 2025.

Incident History — Lawson + Lawson LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lawson + Lawson LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Connolly Suthers Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Connolly Suthers Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lawson2.jpeg
Lawson + Lawson LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/connolly-suthers-lawyers.jpeg
Connolly Suthers Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Lawson + Lawson LLP company and Connolly Suthers Lawyers company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Connolly Suthers Lawyers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lawson + Lawson LLP company.

In the current year, Connolly Suthers Lawyers company and Lawson + Lawson LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Connolly Suthers Lawyers company nor Lawson + Lawson LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Connolly Suthers Lawyers company nor Lawson + Lawson LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Connolly Suthers Lawyers company nor Lawson + Lawson LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lawson + Lawson LLP company nor Connolly Suthers Lawyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lawson + Lawson LLP nor Connolly Suthers Lawyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lawson + Lawson LLP company nor Connolly Suthers Lawyers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Connolly Suthers Lawyers company employs more people globally than Lawson + Lawson LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Lawson + Lawson LLP nor Connolly Suthers Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lawson + Lawson LLP nor Connolly Suthers Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lawson + Lawson LLP nor Connolly Suthers Lawyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lawson + Lawson LLP nor Connolly Suthers Lawyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lawson + Lawson LLP nor Connolly Suthers Lawyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lawson + Lawson LLP nor Connolly Suthers Lawyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Authorization (CWE-285) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation (CAPEC-233) by allowing an authenticated user to bypass intended permission restrictions via a crafted HTTP request. This allows an attacker who lacks the live queries - read permission to successfully retrieve the list of live queries.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15.1, it was possible to overwrite Git configuration remotely and override some of its behavior. Version 5.15.1 fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Elasticsearch can allow an authenticated user with snapshot restore privileges to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of memory and a denial of service (DoS) via crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can allow a low-privileged authenticated user to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of computing resources and a denial of service (DoS) of the Kibana process via a crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (CWE-79) allows an unauthenticated user to embed a malicious script in content that will be served to web browsers causing cross-site scripting (XSS) (CAPEC-63) via a vulnerability a function handler in the Vega AST evaluator.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References