Comparison Overview

Lawson Design

VS

Daniel Chan Design

Lawson Design

3598 Kellington Court, Oceanside, California, 92056, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Since 1990, Lawson Design of Oceanside, California has been trusted with corporate identity and branding identity design assignments, websites, signage & collateral design systems, packaging assignments, trade show exhibit design and more, for a diverse range of businesses. Some of his clients have included American Honda., Honda Automobiles, Acura Automobiles, American Isuzu Motors, Disney Publishing, American Century Investments, Abbott Medical Optics, and Ryder Transportation.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Daniel Chan Design

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Design, layout, brand coordination, and art direction have been my practice for more than a decade. My diverse range of projects have found their way to corporate, business, and consumer audiences. With this experience I also offer my professional, analytical, detail-oriented, and “hands-on” work ethic honed over many years designing and laying out every kind of thing. Let me contribute to your success.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lawson-design.jpeg
Lawson Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daniel-chan-design.jpeg
Daniel Chan Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lawson Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Daniel Chan Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lawson Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Daniel Chan Design in 2025.

Incident History — Lawson Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lawson Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Daniel Chan Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Daniel Chan Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lawson-design.jpeg
Lawson Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daniel-chan-design.jpeg
Daniel Chan Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Lawson Design company and Daniel Chan Design company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Daniel Chan Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lawson Design company.

In the current year, Daniel Chan Design company and Lawson Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Daniel Chan Design company nor Lawson Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Daniel Chan Design company nor Lawson Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Daniel Chan Design company nor Lawson Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lawson Design company nor Daniel Chan Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lawson Design nor Daniel Chan Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lawson Design company nor Daniel Chan Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lawson Design company employs more people globally than Daniel Chan Design company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Lawson Design nor Daniel Chan Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lawson Design nor Daniel Chan Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lawson Design nor Daniel Chan Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lawson Design nor Daniel Chan Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lawson Design nor Daniel Chan Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lawson Design nor Daniel Chan Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X