Comparison Overview

LawData

VS

UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş.

LawData

Neve, Savyon, undefined, undefined, IL
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

LawData online legal research service (Since 1999), offers an advanced work environment that was crafted out of thorough understanding of the needs of legal professionals in Israel. The service contains a comprehensive package of tools, including real time updates of laws and legal developments (cases, laws, news, pleadings, etc.), interactive form completion, simulators for the formation of complex legal calculations, and revolutionary mobile technology for direct remote access at any time, anywhere. LawData promotes a more efficient work environment and helps our clients produce results of superior quality. Thousands of satisfied customers are already enjoying our vast array of innovative information resources, which serves as a comprehensive professional package in the reality of today's dynamic legal environment. Contact us to put LawData to work for you.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş.

Mutlukent Mahallesi 2073 Sokak No:10 Ümitköy Çankaya, Ankara, 06800, TR
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

UDEM olarak, 20 yılı aşkın tecrübemiz ile kaliteli, tarafsız ve sektöre öncülük eden uygunluk değerlendirme ve test hizmetleri sunmaktayız. Kırmızının dinamik ruhu ve Anadolu parsından aldığımız ilhamın birleştiği noktada; Başarılarımızı özgünlükle taçlandırıyor, Profesyonellerin tercihi olmaya devam ediyoruz. *TÜRKAK Akreditasyonu ile ISO 13485 Belgelendirmesi, *TÜRKAK Akreditasyonu İle LVD Kapsamında Test Hizmetleri, *2292 Onaylanmış Kuruluş Numarası ile (AB) 2017/745 Tıbbi Cihaz Yönetmeliği kapsamında Tıbbi Cihaz Uygunluk Değerlendirme Hizmeti, *2292 Onaylanmış Kuruluş Numarası ile 93/42/EEC Tıbbi Cihazlar Yönetmeliği Kapsamında CE İşaretleme, *2292 Onaylanmış Kuruluş Numarası ile 2006/42/EC Makine Emniyeti Yönetmeliği Kapsamında CE İşaretleme

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 106
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lawdata.jpeg
LawData
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/udem-international-certification.jpeg
UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LawData
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LawData in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş. in 2025.

Incident History — LawData (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LawData cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lawdata.jpeg
LawData
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/udem-international-certification.jpeg
UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both LawData company and UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LawData company.

In the current year, UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş. company and LawData company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş. company nor LawData company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş. company nor LawData company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş. company nor LawData company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LawData company nor UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LawData nor UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither LawData company nor UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş. company employs more people globally than LawData company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither LawData nor UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LawData nor UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LawData nor UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LawData nor UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LawData nor UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LawData nor UDEM Belgelendirme A.Ş. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X